Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Sarah Sanders Just Revealed Who Else the White House Is Considering Revoking Security Clearances From, and Reporters Are Calling Her Out

Sarah Sanders Just Revealed Who Else the White House Is Considering Revoking Security Clearances From, and Reporters Are Calling Her Out
WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 18: White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders holds a news conference in the Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House July 18, 2018 in Washington, DC. During the press conference Sanders said that Russian meddling didnÕt happen under President TrumpÕs watch but under the Obama administration. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

So, an enemies list?

The White House came under fire yesterday after Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders announced that President Donald Trump would be revoking the security clearance of ex-CIA head John Brennan, and now reporters are calling Sanders out for announcing whose security clearances the White House may revoke next.

In explaining how the decision to revoke Brennan's security clearance "raises larger questions about the practice of former officials maintaining access to our nation’s most sensitive secrets long after their time in government has ended," Sanders noted that:


Such access is particularly inappropriate when former officials have transitioned into highly partisan positions and seek to use real or perceived access to sensitive information to validate their political attacks.  Any access granted to our nation’s secrets should be in furtherance of national, not personal, interests.  For this reason, I’ve also begun to review the more general question of the access to classified information by government officials.

As part of this review, I am evaluating action with respect to the following individuals: James Clapper, James Comey, Michael Hayden, Sally Yates, Susan Rice, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, and Bruce Ohr.

Security clearances for those who still have them may be revoked, and those who have already lost their security clearance may not be able to have it reinstated.

Sanders' remarks prompted ABC's Jonathan Karl to ask whether the president planned to revoke the security clearances of his political opponents.

"Sarah, first, I’ve got a question I wanted to ask you.  But first, just to follow up on that, it seems like everybody that you mentioned has been a political critic of the President," Karl said. "Is he going after his political opponents with this?

"No," Sanders replied. "If there were others that weren’t, that we deemed necessary, we would certainly take a look and review those as well."

Jeff Mason, the White House Correspondent for Reuters, also questioned the move.

"Hey, Sarah. Following up Jon’s question, how is this announcement by the President — how can Americans not interpret that as a 'getting back against his critics'?" he asked. "And isn’t it also an attempt to curtail their freedom of speech by penalizing them for being critical on television?"

"Not at all," Sanders said. "The President has a constitutional responsibility to protect classified information, and who has access to it.  And that’s what he’s doing is fulfilling that responsibility in this action."

"Is this the kind of precedent he wants to set for future Presidents when his administration is out of office?" Mason asked. "And why are there no Republicans on that list?"

"Once again, if we deemed it necessarily, we would certainly look into that and be happy to review those," Sanders said.

But the questions didn't stop there.

When Sanders called on the Associated Press's Sagar Meghani, he asked, "One of the individuals that you listed on that list of clearances that is under review is Bruce Ohr. He’s a current employee of the Department of Justice.  So instead of putting him under the review, does the President believe he should be fired?"

Sanders claimed she did not have "any personnel announcements" on that front and that she could only "speak to this specific case."

"But why put his security clearance under review, which would render him unable to do his job, and not just fire him?" Meghani asked.

"Once again, I don’t have any personnel announcements on that front. I can just tell you we’re looking into that specific matter."

Then NBC's Peter Alexander weighed in.

"If people who criticize the President publicly on TV or are public in their criticisms, are they at greater risk of losing their security clearances than people who stay silent?" he asked.

Sanders responded that "this is looked at on a case-by-case basis," and that the White House will "do an individual review and make that determination."

The list of individuals whose security clearances will be revoked has been referred to as an "enemies list" by some media outlets, in a nod to the president's decidedly authoritarian leanings:

  • John Brennan, the former CIA director, called President Trump's meeting with Russian leader Vladimir Putin in Helsinki last month "treasonous" after Trump chose to side with Putin over the assessment from U.S. intelligence that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election.
  • James Clapper, the former director of national intelligence, who has often criticized Trump's incendiary rhetoric.
  • James Comey, the former FBI director whom Trump fired last year, prompting a national debate on whether Trump obstructed justice at the time Comey was looking into former national security adviser Michael Flynn's dealings with Russian operatives.
  • Michael Hayden, a former director of the National Security Agency, who has called Trump "disdainful" and "contemptuous."
  • Andrew McCabe, the former deputy FBI director who assumed the role of director after Comey was fired until Christopher Wray's confirmation as Comey's successor. McCabe himself was fired shortly before he was due to retire. He had given testimony about Russia's interference efforts.
  • Bruce Ohr, the former associate deputy attorney general, who was named in the controversial Nunes memo which alleged the FBI had abused its surveillance powers.
  • Lisa Page and Peter Strzok were in a romantic relationship. Strzok led the investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server while Secretary of State. Both individuals found themselves on the receiving end of criticism from Republicans who objected to anti-Trump sentiments the two shared via text message. Their messages prompted Republicans to suggest that the Russia investigation is biased against the president.
  • Susan Rice was former President Barack Obama's national security adviser during his second term and her inclusion here came as a surprise considering her low profile. She has, however, defended the Obama administration and been critical of Trump.
  • Sally Yates, the former deputy attorney general whom Trump fired after she refused to defend his travel ban. She has remained one of Trump's more prominent critics. She was also involved in warrants to surveil Carter Page, a former foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign.

Many have also criticized Sanders for the firing of John Brennan in particular, amid concerns that stripping one of the nation's foremost national security experts of his clearance would actually make a nation already imperiled by a national security crisis in the form of Russian-led cyberattacks would actually make the country much less safe.

"Russian denials are, in a word, hogwash," Brennan said in a spirited New York Times op-ed, in which he defends his years of service to the nation.

More from News

Screenshot of Lauren Boebert speaking to Alex Stein
Prime Time with Alex Stein/Blaze Media

Lauren Boebert Casts Doubt On Moon Landing During Wild Interview With Conspiracy Theorist

Colorado Republican Representative Lauren Boebert was criticized after she seemingly agreed with the conspiracy theory that the moon landing was faked in a wide-ranging interview with conservative conspiracy theorist Alex Stein.

The segment began with the duo casting doubt on nuclear weapons—Boebert even joked about needing "tin foil"—and moved into weirder territory when Stein praised Boebert for "vibing" with him on the topic of the moon landing. Conspiracy theorists have long alleged the moon landing was fabricated by NASA in what they claim was an elaborate hoax.

Keep ReadingShow less
Rosie O'Donnell; Oprah Winfrey
Simon Ackerman/Getty Images; Ernesto Ruscio/GC Images

Rosie O'Donnell Calls Out Oprah For Attending Jeff Bezos' Wedding In Scathing Poem

Among the various celebrity hangers-on who attended Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez's Venice wedding, the one that seemed to generate the most controversy was Oprah Winfrey.

After all, a woman known for her progressive politics whose entire ethos is about teaching people how to be their best selves, attending the wedding of man who directly funded a fascist regime dismantling our country before our eyes doesn't exactly add up.

Keep ReadingShow less
Lisa Murkowski
Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images

Lisa Murkowski Slammed After Criticizing Massive Budget Bill She Just Voted For

Alaska Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski was slammed after she claimed that President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill is "not there yet" despite casting the deciding vote to narrowly pass it before sending it back to the House.

In a marathon voting session, the Senate narrowly passed the legislation in a 51-50 vote, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote after three Republicans joined all Democrats in opposition.

Keep ReadingShow less
Woman listening to her boyfriend play guitar
Photo by Toa Heftiba on Unsplash

Things People Initially Found Attractive About Their Partner That Now Annoy Them

Being in a relationship can be wonderful, but it's not without its ups and downs.

In order for it to work, we have to allow it to grow and change over time rather than being locked forever into what it was when we first started dating our person.

Keep ReadingShow less
JD Vance
Joe Raedle/Getty Images

JD Vance Gets Perfectly Shamed After Claiming Medicaid Cuts In Budget Bill Are 'Immaterial'

Critics slammed Vice President JD Vance after he claimed that the "minutiae of the Medicaid policy" in President Donald Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill," are "immaterial" to the millions of Americans who would lose their healthcare coverage if it were to become law.

According to The Washington Post, the bill "includes the biggest reduction of funding for the federal safety net since at least the 1990s, targeting more than $1 trillion in social spending." WaPo noted that the $3 trillion package "partially pays for its large price tag by slashing spending on Medicaid and food stamps SNAP), which congressional Republicans maintain are rife with fraud."

Keep ReadingShow less