Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Marco Rubio Came for Tillerson, and That's Bad News for Trump

Marco Rubio Came for Tillerson, and That's Bad News for Trump

During the confirmation hearing of Rex Tillerson, President-elect Trump’s pick for Secretary of State, Republican Senator Marco Rubio did not hold back. Perhaps the most striking question of his questions sought to corner Tillerson over whether he would name Russian President Putin a "war criminal." Tillerson responded that he would never use such a term to describe him. That seemed to fire up Rubio, who proceeded to blast Tillerson for not publicly condemning Putin.

"It should not be hard to say that Vladimir Putin’s army has committed war crimes in Aleppo because it is never acceptable for a military—you would agree—to specifically target civilians, which is what has happened there," Rubio intoned. Tillerson attempted to demur by citing the need for information after his confirmation. "I look forward to being fully informed," Tillerson responded, infuriating Rubio who interrupted him declaring, "None of this is classified. There are dead people!" Minutes later Tillerson admitted that he would classify Putin's actions as crimes provided that he had sufficient information and evidence about them.


Rubio further tried to elicit Tillerson’s response to restraints on press freedom including imprisonment and killings of journalists under Putin's regime. The ExxonMobil chief, however, remained reluctant to put the blame on the Russian leader, arguing again that he lacks "sufficient information to make that claim....People who speak up for freedoms in regimes that are oppressive are often a threat and these things happen to them."

Rubio’s support may be crucial for Tillerson to receive confirmation from a closely divided Senate. Should he join with Russia hawks such as Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham, Tillerson may not have the votes he needs. And that would prove a bitter defeat for Trump.

Tillerson's testimony occurred under the unusual backdrop of unsubstantiated intelligence allegations concerning President-elect Trump and Russia. Tillerson's hesitance to condemn Putin for Russian support of Syrian President Assad's regime, which has cost the lives of hundreds of thousands, might be indicative generally of Trump’s softer approach towards Russia. During his press conference yesterday, while admitting that Russia was probably behind the election-related hacks, Trump steered clear of any harsh words or strong criticism.

The issue of US sanctions against Russia also drove tensions between Tillerson and senators on the foreign relations committee from both parties. A lifting of sanction could potentially permit large-scale exploration and exploitation of untapped Russian oil reserves, which might be of interest to the former Exxon CEO. A further question remains whether the new administration will decide to soften or abolish the diplomatic sanctions that President Obama imposed just a few days before his term expired, including the expulsion of over 30 Russian diplomats, which had infuriated Moscow.

His high-ranked position in ExxonMobil at the period while the company was paying millions of dollars to lobby against the Russia sanctions confronted Tillerson with numerous harsh questions from Democrats and Republicans over his role and conspicuous involvement in that strategy of the company on which Tillerson spent almost his entire career.

Although it is in the public records that he had publicly criticized the Obama administration's action to impose severe sanctions on Russia, Tillerson denied that he or Exxon have ever lobbied against the sanctions. "I have never lobbied against sanctions. (...) To my knowledge, Exxon never directly lobbied against sanctions" he suggested. Tillerson's claims were immediately rebutted by the Republican chair of the committee himself, Senator Bob Corker who interjected: "I think you called me at the time (Russia sanctions were being debated)".  

Nevertheless, the evidence that Exxon Mobil under Tillerson's leadership lobbied against Russia sanctions is clear and abundant. And that is probably the reason why Tillerson a few moments later during the confirmation hearing attempted to reformulate his answer by arguing that "the company never opposed sanctions per se, but merely engaged with Congress to understand how Exxon's business would be affected... Exxon Mobil participated in understanding how the sanctions are going to be constructed". Senator Chris Murphy countered Tillerson's response by mentioning that this is something which is hard to disprove but also "very, very hard to believe".  

OpenSecrets, an influence-tracking organization, reports that Exxon Mobil lobbied repeatedly on the Ukraine Freedom Support Act of 2014, which sanctioned the Russian oil industry in retaliation for its invasion of Ukraine. Politico reported last month that "ExxonMobil successfully lobbied against a bill that would have made it harder for the next president to lift sanctions against Russia, clearing the way for the oil giant to restart a program worth billions of dollars if Donald Trump eases those restrictions as president”.

More from News

Kate Gosselin
Slaven Vlasic/Getty Images

Kate Gosselin Shares The 'Lasting Effects' Of Having Sextuplets On Her Body—And We Can Only Imagine

TLC programming was a major part of Millennial and Gen-X culture, particularly shows like Teen Mom, Catfish, Jon & Kate Plus 8, and Keeping Up with the Kardashians.

If you were ever curious for a closer glimpse of Kate Gosselin, mother of twins and then sextuplets, and her life, now is your chance!

Keep ReadingShow less
screenshot of Donald Trump and Kamala Harris presidential debate
CNN

Video Of Kamala Warning Trump About Putin's Agenda Goes Viral After Russian Drones Enter Polish Airspace

One year ago, pundits and the press were analyzing the performances of Democratic presidential candidate Vice President Kamala Harris and former President and MAGA Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump in the first and only debate between the pair before the 2024 presidential election.

During that face-off, it was noted that Trump refused to answer if he wanted United States ally Ukraine to win the war Russia began by invading their neighbor.

Keep ReadingShow less
An 87-year-old Gramercy Park man and his wife fought off a pair of watch thieves in a scam gone wrong.
Eyewitness News ABC7NY/YouTube

87-Year-Old Foils Watch Thieves

Who needs another season of Mr. and Mrs. Smith when Gramercy Park’s own Larry Schwartz and Joanna Cuccia are already serving action-comedy gold? At 87, Schwartz casually knocks out 240 reps a day and chases off watch thieves as if it were just another warm-up set.

And Larry Schwartz wasn’t about to let some Rolex-swapping grifter make him the punchline of a TikTok crime wave.

Keep ReadingShow less
Anna Wintour Reveals Her Honest Reaction To Seeing 'The Devil Wears Prada'—And It's Kind Of Iconic
Gilbert Carrasquillo/GC Images; 20th Century Fox

Anna Wintour Reveals Her Honest Reaction To Seeing 'The Devil Wears Prada'—And It's Kind Of Iconic

If you've ever wondered if legendary Vogue Editor-in-Chief Anna Wintour has ever seen The Devil Wears Prada, the answer is yes, and she's finally shared her opinions on the film.

The movie, based on Lauren Weisberger's novel of the same name, centers around the trials and tribulations a young writer endures under a legendarily icy fashion editor named Miranda Priestley.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots of Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Colbert, and crowd giving standing ovation
CBS

Powerful Line From Sotomayor's Scathing Dissent After ICE Ruling Ignites Standing Ovation On 'Colbert'

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor received a standing ovation during her appearance on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert after Colbert read a line from her powerful dissent following the Court's ruling that immigration agents can use racial profiling when conducting arrests.

The case was brought by several individuals detained during ICE raids. A federal district judge initially found the raids unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Keep ReadingShow less