Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Judge Rules That Fox Defrauded The Producers And Stars Of 'Bones' Out Of Millions Of Dollars In Game-Changing Lawsuit

Judge Rules That Fox Defrauded The Producers And Stars Of 'Bones' Out Of Millions Of Dollars In Game-Changing Lawsuit
FOX/Getty Images

In a stunning move, an arbitrator ordered Fox to pay $179 million to the lead actors of the television show Bones, as well as its executive producer and the author of the books upon which the series was based.

The ruling found that the studio defrauded the stars and the producers out of millions of dollars.


It's the written decision that's really making waves, however, after arbitrator Peter Lichtman said Fox executives exhibited "reprehensible conduct" in giving false testimony to cover up the fraud.

Fox has taken a "cavalier attitude toward its wrongdoing" and exhibits a "company-wide culture and an accepted climate that enveloped an aversion for the truth," he notes.

There are numerous points where Lictman excoriates Fox for misleading the show's stars (Emily Deschanel and David Boreanaz) and producers about "the terms of a release that offered below market rates to license Bones domestically, internationally and for streaming on Hulu because it was produced by a sister company, thereby wrongfully withholding profits" from its stars.

Here he points out that Fox "held the position of relative financial power and used it in the course of negotiations by threatening to cancel the Show and put them out of work."


Bones Arbitration/DocumentCloud

Lichtman says his findings "support a finding of reprehensibility," namely that Fox "engaged in tortious conduct" and "intentionally interfered with Respondents' contracts in connection with the licensing of Bones to Hulu in self-dealing transactions over the last decade":


Bones Arbitration/DocumentCloud

Fox's "cavalier attitude toward its wrongdoing" is evident:

Bones Arbitration/DocumentCloud


The ruling was a long time coming and many praised the arbitrator's decision.





Fox says it disagrees with the ruling and is launching an effort to overturn it.

"The ruling by this private arbitrator is categorically wrong on the merits and exceeded his arbitration powers. Fox will not allow this flagrant injustice, riddled with errors and gratuitous character attacks, to stand and will vigorously challenge the ruling in a court of law."

They announced their intent to try to void the punitive damages of $128.5 million of the total award.


The $179 million award is the second largest verdict in the history of the television industry.

In 2011, a jury issued a $319 million verdict over Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? profit sharing.

More from Trending

Karoline Leavitt
Win McNamee/Getty Images

Karoline Leavitt Slammed After Suggesting Reports Of Deadly Strike On Iranian Girls' School Are Just 'Propaganda'

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt was criticized after she rejected reports that the U.S. struck a girls' elementary school in Iran, killing 175 people, insisting in remarks to the press pool that it's just Iranian "propaganda" that they've "fallen" for.

Iranian state media and health officials said the strike occurred early Saturday morning in Minab, in the country’s southern Hormozgan Province. Journalists from international news organizations have not been granted access to independently verify the reported death toll or the circumstances surrounding the strike.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots from @madswellness's TikTok video
@madswellness/TikTok

Woman Sparks Debate With Her Viral Hot Take That We Should 'Normalize Not Liking Dogs'

We're all different people with different interests, and it's perfectly okay that we like different things.

But there are some people who passionately, even vehemently, draw the line at other people liking or disliking dogs.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots from @vanellimelli030's TikTok video
@vanellimelli030/TikTok

Model Accuses Fashion Brand Of Using AI To Recreate Her Looks For Ad Instead Of Hiring Her

There used to be laws in place for someone's likeness being used without their consent, and most certainly if their likeness was being used in an exploitative way for profit.

But now with the rise of AI-generated photographs, advertisements, and other digital products, the lines seem to have become muddied between the illegal stealing of someone's likeness and AI "inspiration."

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots from @anissahm15's TikTok video
@anissahm15/TikTok

TikToker Secretly Records Unhinged Spectrum Employee Screaming At Her For Trying To Cancel Her Service

Employees in commission-based positions are feeling increasingly pressured to acquire new clients, retain previous clients, and solve the issues their clients call in about with high satisfaction ratings.

Even though tensions are high, and the pressure they're feeling may be unrealistic for any one person to take, that doesn't give them the right to mistreat people who do not want to sign up or want to cancel.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots from @hustleb***h's TikTok video
@hustleb***h/TikTok

Travel Influencer Posts Viral 'Hack' Using Hotel Coffee Maker To Wash Her Underwear—And We're Horrified

We've all worried about packing enough clothes when we go on a trip, especially when it's the really important stuff, like underwear and socks.

But travel influencer @tarawoodcox11 thoroughly grossed out the internet when she shared a hack for maintaining clean, or at least cleaner underwear, while on the go. The video was later shared by the TikTok platform @hustleb*tch where it went viral.

Keep ReadingShow less