Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Don Jr. and Ivanka May Be Able to Avoid Their Subpoenas—Here's Why

Don Jr. and Ivanka May Be Able to Avoid Their Subpoenas—Here's Why

Critics of the former president and his family cheered as news broke earlier in the week that New York Attorney General Letitia James had subpoenaed Donald Trump, Jr. and Ivanka Trump in the NY state civil tax fraud case against the Trump Organization and its leaders. This news came on the heels of news of a subpoena to Donald Trump himself last month.

Many news outlets, including ABC, ran incorrect headlines that Don Jr. and Ivanka “won’t comply” with the subpoenas, likely because the nation is now accustomed to seeing figures in Trumpland like Steve Bannon simply ignore Congressional subpoenas. But in fairness to the requested deponents, Don. Jr. and Ivanka aren’t ignoring the demand to appear, they have moved to quash it. What this means is that their lawyers filed papers with the court asking it to rule that the subpoenas are improper. The matter will be settled well in advance of any date set for the deposition and production of documents. A ruling on a motion to quash also will often wind up setting out the parameters of a deposition and what kinds of documents must be produced to the other side. It is not, as so much of the media reported, a wholesale thumbing of the nose at the process.


Disregard of the process is in fact what got Eric Trump into trouble in the fall of 2020 after AG James also subpoenaed him to testify in the case. As reported by the Washington Post, just two days before his scheduled appearance, Eric Trump’s lawyers abruptly canceled the deposition, refused to produce any documents showing the Trump Organization had paid the proper taxes when one of its lenders forgave a $100 million loan on the Trump hotel in Chicago, and then declined to set a new date for the deposition. AG James then went to court to force Eric Trump to appear. His lawyers cited, somewhat vaguely, his “rights afforded to every individual under the Constitution” to justify his refusing the subpoena—meaning, presumably, his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. It was a curious argument because such a privilege is typically invoked at the deposition, not before it when no question has yet been asked. His lawyers also argued that the subpoena was politically motivated because it was timed to occur before the election. Finding none of these arguments persuasive, in September 2020 a New York State judge granted AG James’s motion to compel, and Eric Trump was required to testify under oath in early October of 2020.

Given this earlier ruling against Eric, are the other Trump children also unlikely to prevail? It turns out, it’s not so straightforward. It also would be a mistake to assume, as many have, that the only purpose here for the motion to quash is to delay the proceedings. After all, Eric Trump’s attempts to delay his deposition till past the election failed rather spectacularly, and it would be risky to appear to be stonewalling the case before the very judge who will decide whether, when, and to what extent you must testify and produce documents.

The gist of the matter for Ivanka and Don Jr. is instead a somewhat thorny intersection between civil and criminal law. In May of 2021, it was reported that AG James’s office had begun actively cooperating with the Manhattan District Attorney’s office on its criminal case, posting two of its own lawyers on that case and later adding to that complement. From the defendants’ perspective, this matters because the line between James’s civil action for tax fraud and the New York City DA’s criminal matter has now become now far more blurred. Because the two offices are now sharing resources and information, there are opportunities for some clever end-runs by James around the normal processes, some of which might go too far.

Take, for example, the way a Manhattan grand jury works. When it calls in witnesses to testify, it is automatic that such witnesses be granted what’s called “transactional immunity” for the testimony that they give. That means that, unless there is a specific waiver of immunity, the witness cannot be prosecuted for any crime that is the subject of their testimony. The upshot is that the Manhattan DA would likely never move to call in one of the Trump children before the grand jury, at least absent some plea deal, because it would effectively let him or her off the hook.

So how do you get the Trump children to testify under oath before the grand jury issues possible indictments against them or their fellow family members? One way is to have them deposed in a civil case, like the one AG James brought. By providing testimony under oath in that setting, there is no issue of transactional immunity. And while it’s true that they can still plead the Fifth Amendment, that doesn’t protect them as well because, unlike a criminal trial, in a civil trial the fact that a witness has taken the Fifth can be used to draw an adverse influence against the defendant as having something to hide.

James likely is fully cognizant of the lose-lose scenario under which she has put the Trump children. Also aware, it seems, are the Trump children’s attorneys. “She’s put her own people, at least four of them, in the District Attorney’s office,” Ronald Fischetti, a lawyer for Don Jr. said to reporters. “And they are talking at the grand jury. They went into the grand jury when witnesses were being briefed. They are still asking for a civil deposition so she can take the answers that she gets and give them to the Manhattan district attorney.”

In their motions to quash, the Trump children’s lawyers reportedly argued that a deposition in the civil case “is effectively the same as a deposition by the [NY District Attorney], but without providing the constitutional protections afforded every witness through the grand jury process.” They further noted, “This is a rather transparent gambit. By attempting to play both sides, Ms. James is in a position to cherry pick her investigatory methods—civil or criminal—in a calculated manner to, for example, leverage a Fifth Amendment assertion and obtain an adverse inference” in the civil investigation.

This is a non-trivial argument, and it might under the right circumstances hold up. The question now is, will a court find fault with this particular squeeze play? James wasn’t necessarily wrong to attempt it, but it won’t succeed if a court ultimately finds this to be an abuse by the AG’s office of the civil process to gather evidence for the criminal case.

The motion should be decided by the court later this month.For more political analysis, check out the Status Kuo newsletter.

More from News

Country Singer Gavin Adcock went on a drunken rant over Beyonce's "Cowboy Carter" success.
Danielle Del Valle/Getty Images; Emma McIntyre/Getty Images for The Recording Academy

Country singer rants over Beyoncé album

Country singer Gavin Adcock became the title of his next album, “Own Worst Enemy,” after going on an unhinged rant about the legitimacy of Beyoncé's Grammy-winning and record-breaking Cowboy Carter in the country music genre.

Adcock, whose upcoming album is set for release next month, was filmed during a live performance last weekend, complaining that Beyoncé and her album are not “country music.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Dionne Warwick; Tiny Chef
Astrida Valigorsky/Getty Images; @ToonHive/X

Dionne Warwick Is Ready To Go To War With Nickelodeon Over 'Tiny Chef' Cancellation

You know your campaign against a show's cancellation is achieving widespread attention when you get people like venerated singer Dionne Warwick advocating for you.

Nickelodeon's The Tiny Chef Show was recently cancelled, much to the dismay of its viewers and creators. It was also a genuinely surprising decision, since the show has won an Emmy.

Keep ReadingShow less
Woman relaxing in sunhat and sunglasses
Photo by Jordan Bauer on Unsplash

People Explain Which 'Small Luxuries' They Can't Live Without

Many of us have committed to being fairly financially frugal and not overspending on silly, unnecessary things.

That is to say, sometimes, it's fun to splurge on something one time to see what it's like to experience that small luxury.

Keep ReadingShow less
two women in emotional distress seated on couch
Ben White on Unsplash

People Who've Experienced Grief Share The Most Tone-Deaf Things They've Heard

Grief, loss, trauma are all part of life. But for most people, the emotions and reactions that go with them are difficult to witness.

So they rely on platitudes to fill any holes in conversation. That's rarely a good idea.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump
Mehmet Eser/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images

Trump Demands 'Boss Of AT&T' Fix Equipment After Failed Conference Call In Bizarre Meltdown

When most of us have technical difficulties, we contact tech support or customer service.

But if you're President of the United States, just ranting on social media—then having your White House Press Secretary post a screenshot of your post on a social media platform people actually use—is apparently the answer.

Keep ReadingShow less