Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Russian Bots Retweeted Donald Trump 500,000 Times During the 2016 Presidential Campaign

Russian Bots Retweeted Donald Trump 500,000 Times During the 2016 Presidential Campaign
(Sergei Fadeichev\TASS via Getty Images)

New details of Russian influence before the election surfaced when Twitter told the Senate Judiciary Committee that Russian bots retweeted Donald Trump's messages over half a million times.

Over 50,000 Russian-linked accounts retweeted Trump's tweets 470,000 times from Sept. 1 to Nov. 15, 2016, and Trump's opponent Hillary Clinton's account was retweeted 50,000 times less within the same period.


On January 19, Twitter addressed Congress in a memo with an "Update on Results of Retrospective Review of Russian-Related Election Activity."

Ready for this?

Giphy


Twitter retroactively researched any Russian interference during the 2016 U.S. presidential election, combing "through malicious automation, coordinated human activity, and advertising."

An excerpt from the report read:

Our data showed that, during the relevant time period, @HillaryClintonTweets were Retweeted approximately 8.6 million times. Of those Retweets, 47,846—or0.55%—were from Russian-linked automated accounts. Tweets from @HillaryClinton receivedapproximately 19.2 million likes during this period; 119,730—or 0.62%—were from Russian-linked automated accounts.
The Tweets from the@realDonaldTrump account during this period were Retweeted more than 11 million times;469,537—or 4.25%—of those Retweets were from Russian-linked, automated accounts. ThoseTweets received approximately 28.8 million likes across our platform; 517,408—or 1.8%—ofthose likes came from Russian-linked automated accounts.



Twitter found that 1,062 accounts were linked to the Internet Research Agency (IRA), or "Glavset," which is Russian slang for Trolls from Olgino or kremlebots.

In total, during the relevant time period, the 3,814 identified IRA-linked accounts posted 175,993 Tweets, approximately 8.4% of which were election related.

It's a fair question.




Twitter emphasized that congressional hearings were a crucial step in understanding how social media platforms work and demonstrate how to prevent the proliferation of "extremist content and disinformation."

In the memo, Twitter explained the process of how election-related data was collected based on Twitter handles and hashtags.

For example, Tweets mentioning@HillaryClinton and @realDonaldTrump received an election-related annotation, as did Tweetsthat included #primaryday and #feelthebern. In total, our review has now encompassed nearly212 million Tweets annotated in this way out of the total corpus of nearly 18.2 billion Tweetsposted during this time period (excluding Retweets).

People have had enough.

But the frustrations expressed could fall on deaf ears.




Why even involve Hillary?



Meanwhile, Facebook claims their data doesn't provide evidence of Russian interference relating to the election. A report in The Hill said that 13 accounts linked to the Internet Research Agency created 129 fake Facebook events.

According to Facebook, 338,300 authentic pages viewed the bogus events and 62,500 accounts confirmed planning to attend them.

So who's accountable?



Suggestions are welcome.



H/T - Twitter, HuffingtonPost, TheHill

More from People/donald-trump

Donald Trump with King Willem-Alexander of the Netherlands and Queen Maxima
Brendan Smialowski - Pool/Getty Images

Dutch Queen Appears To Mockingly Mimic Trump Right In Front Of Him In Hilarious Viral Video

Queen Maxima of the Netherlands has gone viral after she was caught on video appearing to mock the way President Donald Trump speaks while he was in conversation with her and her husband King Willem-Alexander at the Huis ten Bosch Palace in The Hague, where world leaders have attended the NATO summit.

The moment came as Trump spoke to Williem-Alexander to thank the royal couple for their hospitality. The Queen was actively listening to the two men talk but then turned her face toward the cameras, twisting her mouth to resemble Trump's speaking style.

Keep ReadingShow less

Teachers Share The Questions Students Asked In Class That Broke Their Hearts

Being a teacher is a calling.

It is not for the meek or weak of heart.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Emily Compagno
Fox News

Fox Host Slams Dem For Dropping An F-Bomb After Praising Trump For The Same Thing Just Minutes Earlier

Fox News host Emily Compagno was criticized after she praised Donald Trump's use of the "f-bomb" earlier this week before condemning Texas Democratic Representative Jasmine Crockett's use of the same word—on the same episode of her show, no less.

Trump made headlines this week after admonishing Israel and Iran for violating a ceasefire agreement he'd announced on Truth Social. Although he claimed the ceasefire had been "agreed upon," Iran fired at least six missile barrages at Israel after it was supposed to take effect.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ken Jennings; Emily Croke
@Jeopardy/Instagram

Champ's Wild Final Jeopardy Connection

In a dramatic conclusion on last Monday’s Jeopardy!, a contestant revealed a surprising relationship to the final clue's answer. Hailing from Denver, Emily Croke made it to the final write-in portion of the game show with $12,200 in earnings.

In the category of “Collections,” host Ken Jennings read the clue:

Keep ReadingShow less
State Department logo illustration
Thomas Fuller/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

State Department Slammed After Requiring Visa Applicants To Make All Social Media Posts Public For Vetting

The State Department is facing harsh criticism after it announced that anyone applying for an F, M, or J nonimmigrant visa will need to disclose all social media profiles from the last five years, requiring that all applicants set their posts to public so they can be properly vetted by its agents.

The agency said the new rules are part of a new screening process aimed at identifying individuals who may pose a threat to U.S. national security. According to the department, failure to comply could result in a denial, and consular officers have been instructed to flag signs of “hostility” toward the U.S.—though the criteria for such determinations remain vague.

Keep ReadingShow less