Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

The Signs of a Heart Attack Are Different For Women, So Why Haven't We Learned to Identify Them?

Despite the health education classes, emergency response training, and the Public Service Announcements you grew up with, scientists have only begun earnestly studying heart disease in women in the last 18 years.

Historically speaking, a woman’s value resided in the sum of her parts, her womb, her ovaries, the width of her hips, her sex, and her ability to give pleasure. This may be one explanation for why studies into women's health trail decades behind men.

If I were to ask you to list five signs of a heart attack, what would you come up with? If you said cold sweats or nausea, chest pressure or pain, shortness of breath, pain in one or both arms, chest, back or stomach pains, congratulations, the 50 years of research into heart disease has paid off. You correctly identified signs that can help save your father, son, brother, uncle or nephew from a heart attack.


But what about your mother, daughters, sister, aunt or niece? Despite the health education classes, emergency response training and the Public Service Announcements you grew up with, scientists have only begun studying heart disease in women in earnest over the last 18 years. So it has only been since then that we learned that the symptoms for a heart attack in women include lightheadedness or dizziness, upper back pain, fainting or fatigue, in addition to shortness of breath and chest pains, two symptoms shared between the sexes.

Between 1949 and 1999, the cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality rate for men dropped precipitously as a result of the many studies performed during that period and the subsequent treatments that were developed. By 1999, CVD deaths in men dropped by 59 percent. However, cardiovascular disease in women rose and the mortality rate surpassed that of the mid-20th century numbers that spurred research into CVD in the first place. Until the early 2000s, 85 percent of participants in CVD studies were men. In 1990, the U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) issued a report that showed that women with childbearing potential were systematically excluded from all phases of drug trials related to CVD. Women were even excluded when selections were supposed to be random, along with men 80 to 85 of age.

The report sparked a congressional investigation and propelled women's advocacy groups into action. In response to the pressure, the National Institute of Health (NIH) formed The Office of Research on Women’s Health. However, it was not until The NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 required, by law, that NIH-funded studies include women, that the Office of Research on Women’s Health became a funded federal agency. It is noteworthy that the office's initial creation was solely symbolical; it was not until the passing of the 1993 act did the agency have teeth and the funding to carry out its mandate.

The federal changes suggested an equal amount of dollars would be committed to women’s health research, and that, specifically, funds would be devoted to research into CVD, the number one killer of women in America. However, a 2013 report from the American Heart Association shows a commitment of $5,589,841 to the study of heart disease in women. This number topped the list of dollars committed to specific minority groups; Asian studies received the least with $52,000 being committed. However, stacked next to the $3.5 billion spent on research into CVD in the first 50 years of research, that number is dismal.

If a woman’s value is more than the sum of her parts, her womb, her ovaries, her hips, then her body as a whole should be protected. The key to providing this protection lies in equivalent and gender-appropriate research and education in women’s health. 1 in every 4 or 289,758 women died from a heart attack in 2013. If we saw the same 59 percent reduction men saw as a result of fifty years of research, 170,957 women’s lives would be saved.

It has been 25 years since the passing of The NIH Revitalization Act of 1993. We are not well on our way to dropping the mortality rate for women. Women’s heart attacks are still more likely to be misdiagnosed and most medical schools still do not incorporate what little we have learned about CVD in women in their classes. In 2018, why are the dollars committed to the study of CVD in women stagnant and the death toll still so high? If a woman received the same time, care, and adequate dollars as her male counterpart, we would be armed with the skills and tools to not only save our fathers, sons, brothers, uncles or nephews, but our mothers, daughters, sisters, aunts or nieces too. The question that begs to be asked, two and half decades into what should have been a period marked by advancements in the study of CVD in women, is both simplistic and damning:

What is the value of your mother’s, daughters’, sisters’, aunts’ or nieces’ life? Are they not worth saving too? The rhetoric says they are. However, actions and money say otherwise.

More from News

Ribvar Karimi and Morgan Gardner Karimi
Morgan Karimi/Facebook

Alabama Woman 'Blindsided' After ICE Detains Her Trump-Supporting Iranian Husband

Another day, another MAGA face eaten by a leopard.

The "it wasn't supposed to happen to me" movement claimed two more victims on Sunday, June 22, when Ribvar Karimi was abducted by the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS's) Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents in a sweep that included 11 Iranians.

Keep ReadingShow less
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Alex Wong/Getty Images

RFK Jr. Admits That Banning Fluoridated Water Will Cause 'More Cavities'—But He's OK With That

Health and Human Services Secretary (HHS) Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was criticized after admitting in a Fox News interview with Harris Faulkner that his proposed fluoridated water ban would likely lead people to have more cavities—but defended the move nonetheless.

While fluoride is not federally mandated in drinking water, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) had long recommended its inclusion. Fluoride helps prevent cavities by strengthening enamel, and numerous studies have shown that fluoridated water reduces tooth decay in both children and adults.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Jesse Watters discussing Zohran Mamdani
Fox News

Jesse Watters Dragged After Trying To Give Mamdani A Scary Nickname That's Actually Kind Of Epic

Fox News personality Jesse Watters was widely mocked after he tried to give New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani a scary nickname in the vein of Conan the Destroyer—only for it to backfire considerably.

Watters is the latest member of the GOP to lash out at Mamdani, a democratic socialist who handily defeated former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary last week.

Keep ReadingShow less
A man sitting on a couch
man sitting on sofa
Photo by Kelly Sikkema on Unsplash

People Sound Off On What Caused Them To Fire Their Therapist

We thankfully live in a world where there's no longer a stigma surrounding therapy.

Some people simply need professional help to deal with ongoing problems or even to get through the day.

Keep ReadingShow less
Andy Ogles; Zohran Mamdani
Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images (left and right)

MAGA Rep Slammed After Calling For Mamdani To Be Stripped Of His Citizenship And Deported Over Rap Lyric

Tennessee Republican Andy Ogles was called out after he shared a letter he sent to Attorney General Pam Bondi urging her to denaturalize and deport New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani over a lyric in a rap song Mamdani released in 2017.

Mamdani ran a campaign centered around economic populism, arguing that the city, a global financial center, has grown unaffordable for everyday residents, citing soaring rents and grocery prices, and outlining policies aimed at reducing the cost of living.

Keep ReadingShow less