Search
AI Powered
Human content,
AI powered search.
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Latest News
Don’t Miss Out
Join the
ComicSands.com
community and make your opinion matter.
More from Trending
Stephen Colbert Rips CBS For Banning Interview With Texas Democrat Due To FCC Threat
Feb 17, 2026
Late-night host Stephen Colbert criticized CBS for attempting to ban him from interviewing Texas Senate candidate James Talarico, and from even mentioning the interview on air, due to threats from Brendan Carr, the chair of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).
Talarico, who represents Texas in the state House, has previously made headlines for calling out Texas Republicans for "trying to force public schools" to display the Ten Commandments and has generated significant buzz as a forceful voice for Democrats in a state largely in the hands of the GOP.
Colbert informed his viewers that Talarico "was supposed to be here, but we were told in no uncertain terms by our network’s lawyers, who called us directly, that we could not have him on the broadcast." He added that "I was told, in some uncertain terms, that not only could I not have him on, I could not mention me not having him on."
Interestingly, Talarico described Republicans during the interview as "the party that ran against cancel culture, and now they are trying to control what we watch, what we say, what we read"—words that resonate in the wake of the interview being pulled from the air.
Talarico himself described his appearance on Colbert's show as "the interview Donald Trump didn’t want you to see," adding that "Trump is worried we’re about to flip Texas."
You can see Talarico's full interview that didn't air below:
Colbert said the banned interview followed updated guidance from Carr, who floated applying the “equal time” rule more strictly to late-night programming. The policy requires broadcasters to offer comparable airtime to competing political candidates. Traditionally, news and talk show interviews have been exempt from that requirement.
But as Colbert noted, Carr’s recent comments suggested he may reconsider that carve-out for late-night shows, arguing that some programs appear to operate with overtly partisan intent.
Then he called out Carr's hypocrisy:
“Well, FCC you. I think you are motivated by partisan purposes yourself. Sir, you smelt it because you dealt it. Let’s call this what it is: Donald Trump‘s administration wants to silence anyone who says anything bad about Trump on TV because all Trump does is watch TV. He’s like a toddler with too much screen time.”
“It’s no surprise that two of the people most affected by this threat are me and my friend Jimmy Kimmel.”
He next rolled Carr’s rebuttal to the way he and fellow late-night host Jimmy Kimmel had tackled the revamped Equal Time rule on their respective programs:
“If Kimmel or Colbert want to continue to do their programming and they don’t want to have to comply with this requirement, then they can go to a cable channel or a podcast or a streaming service and that’s fine.”
In response, Colbert quipped:
“Great idea, Man Whose Job Is to Regulate Broadcast TV! Suggest everyone leave broadcast TV!”
Colbert added that, in line with Carr’s suggestion, he would publish the complete Talarico interview on YouTube:
“The network says I can’t give you the URL or a QR code, but if you go to our YouTube page, you’ll find it.”
“At this point, [Carr has only] released a letter that says he’s thinking about doing away with the exception—but my network is unilaterally enforcing it as if he had. But I want to assure you, this decision is for purely financial reasons."
“And this doesn’t just affect interviews. The rules forbid any candidate appearance, including by voice or picture. So I can’t interview James Talarico, I can’t show any pictures of James Talarico, and I’m not even sure I can say the words ‘James Talarico.'"
He then joked that "what I can show you is what we always show when we have to pull material at the last minute–this tasteful nude of Brendan Carr"—and showed a mock-up of a nude Carr with his privates covered by a cactus.
You can hear what Colbert said in the video below.
- YouTube youtu.be
Colbert's words struck a chord and exposed CBS, Carr, and the FCC to heavy criticism.
Colbert has been speaking out despite pushback since CBS' cancellation of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert.
Colbert has consistently been at the top of the late-night ratings, but last year, CBS, citing economic concerns, announced that his program would go off the air in May—news that came as its parent company, Paramount, sought government approval for a merger with Skydance.
The FCC later approved the merger and Paramount paid $16 million to settle a lawsuit brought by President Donald Trump, which Colbert said amounted to a payoff to secure approval for the merger.
Months later, Paramount Skydance CEO David Ellison unveiled a deal—reportedly valued at $150 million—to purchase Bari Weiss’ contrarian outlet The Free Press, while also installing her as the top editorial leader at CBS News. The move fueled speculation among media analysts that Ellison was attempting to bolster the network’s credibility with Trump and the broader MAGA base.
Last month, the network came under fire for airing a cringey tribute to Secretary of State Marco Rubio complete with AI-generated memes portraying Rubio in a series of exaggerated roles, including prime minister of Greenland, head of Hilton Hotels, and the Michelin Man.
Weiss was also called out for killing a 60 Minutes segment about El Salvador's notorious CECOT prison facility. The planned segment was reportedly set to sharply criticize the Trump administration’s handling of migrants detained by ICE and sent to the prison.
After the decision, correspondent Sharyn Alfonsi, who led the investigation, went public, openly challenging her boss and sharing internal details about how and why the story was killed. She said in a letter leaked to media outlets that killing the story "after every rigorous internal check has been met, is not an editorial decision, it is a political one."
Keep Reading
Show less
Most Read
American Girl Dolls Just Got An 'Ozempic' Makeover For The 'Modern Era'—And People Are Not Impressed
Feb 17, 2026
There's nothing quite like the grip American Girl dolls had on Millennials during the mid-1990s and early 2000s.
Created in 1986 by the Pleasant Company, American Girl dolls were meant to model positive core values with dolls that resembled young women from various time periods across American history and different favorite hobbies, like horseback riding and cheerleading.
These dolls each shared a sweet, expressive face with bright, somewhat realistic eyes, and their figures resembled that of a young girl before reaching puberty. Because most of these dolls were "period pieces," they wore more conservative and modest outfits, showing very little of their bodies.
Each doll also came with a storybook about their life, their hobbies, and the time period from which they came, giving these dolls a special, educational edge.
Now, to celebrate 40 years in business, American Girl dolls now include a new "Modern Era" series.
Each of these is noticeably different from its predecessor, as they are shorter in height and noticeably thinner. Their heads are smaller and rounder, while their eyes are much more pronounced and jarring to look at. They also each wear currently popular clothing, most of them in short skirts.
The description for the Modern Era dolls reads:
"Discover the Modern Era Collection of 14.5-inch dolls and fashions."
"Felicity, Addy, Molly, Kirsten, Samantha, and Josefina reimagined for today."
Each doll is $90, with additional clothes and accessories sold separately.
It's unclear if the Pleasant Company intends to go in a new direction and create all "modern" dolls now, but fans of the original dolls were not happy about their new look.
From the shift to more revealing clothing to the dramatic body proportion changes, this new line of "Modern Era" dolls feels like it could easily devolve into body-shaming, fat-shaming, sexualization of increasingly younger women and girls. And all of these dolls look like they could easily exist in the same "clique" at their local school.
This seems like an unnecessary deviation from the original American Girl doll and the values and storytelling that were paired with them, especially when there are plenty of other dolls with no history or individuality.
Keep Reading
Show less
'Wall Street Journal' Ripped After Saying Millennials And Gen Zers Are 'Splurging' On 'Rotisserie Chickens' Instead Of Buying Homes
Feb 17, 2026
It's sadly all too common for older generations to look down on millennials and criticize their constant complaining about how "hard" life is and how they can't afford to be homeowners.
That criticism almost always ignores factors like the rising cost of housing, increasingly low salaries, and a continuous housing shortage.
Australian real-estate mogul Tim Gurner made headlines a decade or so ago when he claimed millennials couldn't afford to purchase a home due to their obsessions with avocado toast.
Now The Wall Street Journal also seems to be blaming millennials' lack of home ownership on their obsession with food.
Only they seemed to have a more carnivorous opinion.
A recently published article highlighted the growth of luxury grocery stores, something they suggested millennials have a near obsession with.
However, when promoting the article on their X (formerly Twitter) page, The Wall Street Journal instead made it seem as if the bulk of the poor financial decision making by Millennials was due to their constant need to buy rotisserie chickens:
The post, which linked to the article (behind a pay wall), included a caption suggesting millennials and Gen-Zers were having difficulty sorting out their priorities based on their choices when grocery shopping:
"Gen Zers and millennials are swimming in student debt and may never own homes, but they’re splurging on gut-healthy juices and rotisserie chickens."
The article goes on to say that despite New York City being in the midst of an "affordability crisis," young people keep the aisles at luxury food stores full, seemingly in an effort to gain more social media followers:
"New York City as a whole is in the midst of an affordability crisis, one that helped elect Mayor Zohran Mamdani, yet a new crop of luxury prepared-food purveyors is drawing massive crowds in Manhattan and driving social-media discourse."
"Influencers fill aisles in search of trendy nut butters and overpriced salads."
"The stores are packed on weekends with teens who inhale frozen yogurt."
As one might expect, the post received some very passionate reactions on X.
Countless people wasted no time in sharing their disbelief and confusion, with many pointing out that people choose to buy rotisserie chickens because of how inexpensive they are, and others pointing out the irony that people had to pay simply to read the article The Wall Street Journal was promoting:
Interestingly, one thing never mentioned in the article is the average price of a rotisserie chicken, which is almost always under $10, usually selling for as little as $4.99 at Costco.
Instead, The Wall Street Journal merely mentions luxury grocery stores selling "$15 chicken nuggets," but never the price of chicken in any other form, including rotisserie.
One can only wonder where the fact checkers at The Wall Street Journal do their grocery shopping.
Or, for that matter, if they can afford to buy a home, based on the generally low wages most people make in print journalism...
Keep Reading
Show less
Cardi B Claps Back Hard At Homeland Security After They Mock Her For Threatening To 'Jump' ICE At Her Concert
Feb 17, 2026
People unfamiliar with rap music may not know much about the art form or its stars.
The majority of the world might only know Cardi B as one of the women—with Megan Thee Stallion—behind the song "WAP" that was certified Platinum nine times in just the United States before hitting Diamond eligible status in late 2025 with 10 million units sold.
The hit song celebrated female sexuality in a way male artists had for decades, which had misogynistic and misogynoir Republicans and other political conservatives around the globe up in arms a few years ago.
But Cardi B is also a mother of four children who spoke out about her struggles with postpartum depression and mental health in general, encouraging people—especially teens—to seek help.
She also holds several records including the most #1 singles on the Billboard Hot 100 for a female rapper, the highest-certified female rapper of all time in U.S. digital single sales, and eight Guinness World Records. And Cardi B has a Grammy, eight Billboard Music Awards, 14 BET Hip Hop Awards, six American Music Awards, and four MTV Video Music Awards.
People unfamiliar with Cardi B also may not know she’s been calling out MAGA Republican President Donald Trump for the bigotry central to his MAGA movement since his first term in office. Or that Cardi B claps back—hard—to her critics.
People unfamiliar with rap as an art form may not know about rap battles—often spontaneous displays of wit which require the wordsmiths to one up each other with clever insults. Or they may not be familiar with diss tracks, lyrics composed to mock, disrespect, or attack another person or artist.
Apparently whoever runs the social media accounts for Kristi Noem's Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is unfamiliar with both rap and Cardi B if they thought they could come for her online and emerge victorious—or at least unscathed.
The feud began on Wednesday, February 11, after Cardi B told attendees at the Palm Desert, California, stop of her Little Miss Drama tour what would happen if DHS's Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents attacked her fans at her concerts.
Cardi B asked the crowd:
"Where are my Latinos in the mother f*cking building?"
She then stated:
"Bitch, if ICE comes in here, we gon’ jump they a**es. Bitch, I’ve got some bear mace in the back! They ain’t taking my fans, bitch!"
You can see her comments here:
On Thursday, the DHS social media minders were feeling cute and decided to poke back at Cardi B on X.
The cabinet-level federal agency posted:
"As long as she doesn’t drug and rob our agents, we’ll consider that an improvement over her past behavior."
Cardi B had previously stated in a live feed that as a young woman working as a stripper, she had "drugged and robbed" men who wanted to have sex with her, describing it as "what I had to do to survive" due to extreme poverty and an abusive relationship.
The irony of an administration headed by an individual with 34 felony convictions, numerous fraud judgments including defrauding a children's charity, fined for racist housing discrimination, and who was held legally and fiscally liable for sexual assault calling out anyone's criminality was entirely lost on DHS.
In response to the DHS post, Cardi B wrote:
"If we talking about drugs let’s talk about Epstein and friends drugging underage girls to rape them. Why yall don’t wanna talk about the Epstein files?"

DHS might also be unfamiliar with getting ratio'd.
That's when you post a gotcha on Elon Musk's misogynistic, right-wing, MAGA-friendly platform and get 192.4k likes and the clap back from the Black, female rapper you just attacked gets 708.3k likes. That's over 515,000 more likes.
Then on Saturday, Cardi B kicked them again.
After news broke that DHS would need to shut down due to lack of funds, Cardi B posted a Dr. Evil GIF with the caption:
"I planned this"
People were loving the rapper's responses to the Trump administration's civil and human rights violations as well as their online attacks against her.


Be a Cardi. Don’t be a Nicki.
— JARED GOFF (@icedbrew2.bsky.social) February 12, 2026 at 10:53 AM
now that's a vibe! cardi coming in hot with the bear mace? iconic. let’s protect our faves fiercely like cucumbers in a pickle factory! i'm here for the chaos!(re: @esqueer.net)
— Jerked Gherkins (@j3rkedgherkins.bsky.social) February 12, 2026 at 12:45 PM
I mean cool but I can’t possibly love her any more than I do
— Antilles (@wedgeantilles.bsky.social) February 12, 2026 at 5:55 PM
This makes me worried she’s going to be targeted. Of course there isn’t a jury that would convict her of whatever trumped up charges the DOJ will throw at her but they can still do some damage
— thebook-wyrm.bsky.social (@thebook-wyrm.bsky.social) February 12, 2026 at 9:52 AM
Cardi B’s legal team has buried anyone who tried to come at her. I think she knows how to pick a fighter
— lmhinh.bsky.social (@lmhinh.bsky.social) February 14, 2026 at 7:57 PM

That woman is a national treasure.
— JessicaBlack (@jessbheart.bsky.social) February 12, 2026 at 8:06 AM

Of her past, Cardi B explained:
"I'm a part of a hip-hop culture where you can talk about where you come from, talk about the wrong things you had to do to get where you are."
She also pointed out many of her male counterparts "glorify murder, violence, drugs and robbing" in their hit songs.
She added:
"I never glorified the things I brought up in that live [video], I never even put those things in my music because I'm not proud of it and feel a responsibility not to glorify it."
"I made the choices that I did at the time because I had very limited options."
Limited options due to extreme poverty and lack of opportunities—something else that the billionaires and millionaires of the Trump administration are also entirely unfamiliar with.
Keep Reading
Show less
Trump Roasted After Making Bonkers Comparison Between Gas Prices In Iowa And California
Feb 17, 2026
President Donald Trump was widely mocked for making a nonsensical comparison between gas prices in Iowa versus California during a ceremony at the White House in which he was given an award for being the "undisputed champion of beautiful clean coal."
Trump's recognition reportedly came from the Washington Coal Club, a pro-coal advocacy organization with financial links to the sector. The award was presented by James Grech, chief executive of Peabody Energy, the nation’s largest coal producer. The bronze trophy depicts a miner equipped with a headlamp and pickaxe.
The ceremony coincided with Trump signing an executive order instructing the Department of Defense to enter long-term power agreements with coal plants supplying military bases and other facilities deemed essential to national security.
He also announced that the Department of Energy would distribute $175 million to six initiatives aimed at upgrading and prolonging the operation of coal plants serving rural or remote communities in West Virginia, Ohio, North Carolina, and Kentucky.
But of course a White House ceremony wouldn't be a White House ceremony without Trump taking the stage to ramble incoherently and pontificate about things he knows nothing about—such as the moment he took a swipe at California over gas prices from a year and a half ago.
He said:
"You see what's happening with gasoline. I was in Iowa last week. Gas was $1.85 a gallon and many of them are $1.99 and $1.91. I saw we have them just under $2 now."
"I saw a little while ago, just a year and a half ago, they were at $3.50, $4, $4.50 in California. $7. Those are some crazy taxes."
You can hear what he said in the video below.
It made no sense to see Trump treat regional price differences and temporary price spikes as proof of a single policy effect when in reality gas prices vary widely by location and market conditions.
But of course he did, though—and he's flat out wrong about what prices look like at the moment.
Gas prices in California climbed for a second straight week, reaching an average of $4.31 per gallon for regular fuel last Monday, up from $4.18 the week before, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.
The statewide average has increased roughly 34 cents over the past month. Over the last year, prices have fluctuated between a low of $3.98 on Jan. 19, 2026, and a high of $4.73 on April 7, 2025. By comparison, the average price a year ago was slightly higher, at $4.39 per gallon.
People were quick to mock him in response.
Much as it did during Trump's first round in office, the Trump administration has generated controversy for making plans to order grid operators to buy electricity from struggling coal and nuclear plants in a bid to extend their life, marking an unprecedented federal intervention into energy markets.
These plans drew significant criticism from researchers and policymakers alike whose findings conclude that the coal industry is largely obsolete. Nonetheless, Trump has previously come under fire for stacking his administration with coal energy veterans and other members of the fossil fuel lobby.
Keep Reading
Show less
Load More















