Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

GOP Rep. Instantly Fact-Checked After He Tried To Use 9/11 To Argue Against Gun Safety Measures

GOP Rep. Instantly Fact-Checked After He Tried To Use 9/11 To Argue Against Gun Safety Measures
C-SPAN

In the wake of two major mass shootings, Republican legislators ramped up their gun rights rhetoric.

A White nationalist killed 10—mostly elderly—Black people at a grocery store in Buffalo, New York in a racially motivated act of domestic terrorism. Then another gunman murdered 19 children and two teachers at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas.


But while the public and Democratic leadership called for enacting popular gun control meSures, the GOP did the work of their National Rifle Association donors and deflected blame or spouted pro-gun propaganda. They called for fewer doors and more guns in schools as a solution to school shootings.

Just three days after the Uvalde murders, Texas Republican Senators John Cornyn and Ted Cruz and former Republican President Donald Trump made the trip to Houston, Texas to support the National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA) at their annual leadership forum. The NRA-ILA works to block gun control legislation and to pass legislation to weaken existing gun control laws.

On Wednesday—flanked by New York GOP Representative Elise Stefanik and Ohio Republican Representative Jim Jordan, House Minority Whip Steve Scalise repeated rhetoric Colorado GOP Congresswoman Lauren Boebert was chastised for in May.

Scalise stated in the wake of terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001:

"There wasn't a conversation about banning airplanes."

On May 26—two days after the gun murders at the Texas elementary school—Republican Representative Lauren Boebert stated:

"When 9/11 happened, we didn’t ban planes."

The parroted rhetoric likely comes from the same talking points memos from the same sources.

But is it accurate?

In the wake of 9/11, the airspace over the entire United States became a no-fly zone for all commercial and private planes. Only military and emergency services flights were allowed for weeks after the attacks.

In Washington DC, Reagan National Airport was restricted to a single approach and departure corridor. The size of planes allowed to fly to Reagan was also restricted.

Those sounded a lot like bans on planes to people.



People weren't willing to buy the comparison from Scalise any more than they did from Boebert.




On Sunday, Scalise appeared on Fox News Sunday with host John Roberts.

When Roberts asked Scalise if the GOP was out of touch in their unwavering support of gun sales, Scalise repeatedly dodged the question.

You can see excerpts below:

Roberts cited Quinnipiac poll data.

Polls confirmed 89% of voters want stronger background checks and 74% want the red flag regulations Scalise railed against.

Scalise countered voters in the United States aren't as well-informed as he and other gun rights advocates.

People begged to differ on who was uninformed.



Whether the disconnect between what voters want and the Republicans' devotion to the NRA will affect the 2022 midterms remains to be seen.

More from News

Kate Gosselin
Slaven Vlasic/Getty Images

Kate Gosselin Shares The 'Lasting Effects' Of Having Sextuplets On Her Body—And We Can Only Imagine

TLC programming was a major part of Millennial and Gen-X culture, particularly shows like Teen Mom, Catfish, Jon & Kate Plus 8, and Keeping Up with the Kardashians.

If you were ever curious for a closer glimpse of Kate Gosselin, mother of twins and then sextuplets, and her life, now is your chance!

Keep ReadingShow less
screenshot of Donald Trump and Kamala Harris presidential debate
CNN

Video Of Kamala Warning Trump About Putin's Agenda Goes Viral After Russian Drones Enter Polish Airspace

One year ago, pundits and the press were analyzing the performances of Democratic presidential candidate Vice President Kamala Harris and former President and MAGA Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump in the first and only debate between the pair before the 2024 presidential election.

During that face-off, it was noted that Trump refused to answer if he wanted United States ally Ukraine to win the war Russia began by invading their neighbor.

Keep ReadingShow less
An 87-year-old Gramercy Park man and his wife fought off a pair of watch thieves in a scam gone wrong.
Eyewitness News ABC7NY/YouTube

87-Year-Old Foils Watch Thieves

Who needs another season of Mr. and Mrs. Smith when Gramercy Park’s own Larry Schwartz and Joanna Cuccia are already serving action-comedy gold? At 87, Schwartz casually knocks out 240 reps a day and chases off watch thieves as if it were just another warm-up set.

And Larry Schwartz wasn’t about to let some Rolex-swapping grifter make him the punchline of a TikTok crime wave.

Keep ReadingShow less
Anna Wintour Reveals Her Honest Reaction To Seeing 'The Devil Wears Prada'—And It's Kind Of Iconic
Gilbert Carrasquillo/GC Images; 20th Century Fox

Anna Wintour Reveals Her Honest Reaction To Seeing 'The Devil Wears Prada'—And It's Kind Of Iconic

If you've ever wondered if legendary Vogue Editor-in-Chief Anna Wintour has ever seen The Devil Wears Prada, the answer is yes, and she's finally shared her opinions on the film.

The movie, based on Lauren Weisberger's novel of the same name, centers around the trials and tribulations a young writer endures under a legendarily icy fashion editor named Miranda Priestley.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots of Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Colbert, and crowd giving standing ovation
CBS

Powerful Line From Sotomayor's Scathing Dissent After ICE Ruling Ignites Standing Ovation On 'Colbert'

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor received a standing ovation during her appearance on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert after Colbert read a line from her powerful dissent following the Court's ruling that immigration agents can use racial profiling when conducting arrests.

The case was brought by several individuals detained during ICE raids. A federal district judge initially found the raids unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Keep ReadingShow less