Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Turns Out Donald Trump's Lawyers Desperately Tried to Convince Robert Mueller Not to Call Donald Trump to Testify and We See Why

Turns Out Donald Trump's Lawyers Desperately Tried to Convince Robert Mueller Not to Call Donald Trump to Testify and We See Why
U.S. President Donald Trump makes brief remarks during a meeting in the Oval Office at the White House August 28, 2018 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Trying to save him from himself.

Make us preferred on Google

President Donald Trump maintained for months he wanted to speak to Special Counsel Robert Mueller. To that end, his personal legal team worked on negotiating terms agreeable to themselves for an interview between the President and the Special Counsel.

But did Trump really want to speak to Mueller as he so often claimed?


According to a new book from investigative journalist Bob Woodward, the answer is "maybe, but not really."  In Fear: Trump in the White House, Woodward shares the results of "hundreds of hours of interviews with firsthand participants and witnesses."

One area addressed in Fear involved preparations with the President and his then legal team for a potential open interview—without restrictions—between the Mueller investigation and Trump. According to Woodward, Trump's lead lawyer John Dowd set up a practice session with the President on January 27, 2018.

In the comfort of the White House residence, Dowd battered the President with questions regarding details of the Russia investigation. It did not go well.

Political pundits—both critics and supporters of the President—posited Trump speaking to Mueller was ill-advised. According to witnesses of the Dowd practice session in January, it went as poorly as expected.

The rehearsal questions resulted in "stumbles, contradictions and lies" until Trump's temper boiled over. The resulting 30 minute rant ended with the President finally agreeing that sitting down with Mueller for an interview would end badly for him.

The hhalf-houroutburst began when Trump stated:

"This thing’s a goddamn hoax."

...and ended when the President acknowledged:

"I don’t really want to testify."

However, the President notoriously puts great emphasis on public perception. He worried how a President refusing to testify would look. Which led to the real bombshell about January's practice session.

According to Woodward's account, during a March 5 meeting with the Special Counsel, Dowd and another Trump legal team member—Jay Sekulow—pushed to have Trump's name removed from Mueller's interview list permanently.

They cited national interests and Trump's inherent nature. Dowd and Sekulow reenacted the mock interview, then Dowd reportedly told Mueller and his deputy James Quarles:

"I’m not going to sit there and let him look like an idiot. And you publish that transcript, because everything leaks in Washington, and the guys overseas are going to say, 'I told you he was an idiot. I told you he was a goddamn dumbbell. What are we dealing with this idiot for?'."

Dowd also argued Trump's natural tendency to lie made him an unreliable witness. In reference to answers the President gave during his practice interview, Dowd stated:

"He just made something up. That's his nature."

But by the end of March, Trump again stated he wanted to meet with Mueller. Dowd told the President:

"Don’t testify. It’s either that or an orange jumpsuit."

Trump responded:

"I’ll be a real good witness."

Dowd replied:

"You are not a good witness. Mr. President, I’m afraid I just can’t help you."

Dowd resigned as the President's lawyer on March 22.

People reacted to the news of Trump's legal team's intervention with Robert Mueller to head off an interview with the President.

Talk of an interview with Trump for the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and possible ties with the Trump campaign—beyond those already established in the congressional testimony of Donald Trump Jr. and Jared Kushner—died off recently.

The President's current lead lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, spoke to the media on numerous occasions about an interview between Trump and the Special Counsel, but only on the President's terms. But while he spoke of arranging an interview, Giuliani and his boss both attacked Robert Mueller and the Russia investigation online and in interviews.

Both frequently referred to the Department of Justice investigation—which already resulted in multiple indictments, guilty pleas and guilty verdicts—as a witch hunt and demanded it come to an end.

Did Trump ever want to speak to Mueller? Possibly. Was it ever a good idea? Experts and armchair lawyers all said no.

But are the current attacks orchestrated by the President and his lead counsel, Giuliani, on social media and in interview after interview designed to ensure Trump never needs to make that decision? Only the President and his lawyer know for sure.

More from People/donald-trump

Marco Rubio
Eric Lee/Getty Images

Marco Rubio Just Tried To Claim That 'American Citizenship Is Not For Sale'—And Everyone Had The Same Response

Secretary of State Marco Rubio was called out after trying to claim on X that "American citizenship is not for sale," even though the Trump administration offers a route toward citizenship in exchange for a large financial contribution.

Birthright citizenship is a legal concept that grants citizenship automatically at birth. It exists in two forms: ancestry-based citizenship and birthplace-based citizenship. The latter, known as jus soli, a Latin term meaning "right of the soil," grants citizenship based on the location of birth.

Keep ReadingShow less
Pete Hegseth
Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images

Pete Hegseth's Past Comments About Hygiene Resurface After He's Caught On Video Running His Snotty Hands Through His Hair

Remarks about not having washed his hands "in 10 years" resurfaced after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was caught on video wiping his nose with his hands before immediately running those same hands through his hair.

Hegseth was seen doing just that while listening to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent deliver remarks. Footage went viral after it was shared by progressive journalist Aaron Rupar.

Keep ReadingShow less
John Hinckley Jr. (left) shares a new message for Jodie Foster (right) 45 years after the assassination attempt on President Ronald Reagan.
The Mark Joseph Show/YouTube; Gary Gershoff/WireImage

John Hinckley Jr. Shares New Message For Jodie Foster 45 Years After Shooting Ronald Reagan To Impress Her

Some Hollywood stories fade with time. The disturbing history connecting Jodie Foster and John Hinckley Jr. is not one of them. For those who don’t know, on March 30, 1981, Hinckley waited outside the Washington Hilton in Washington, D.C., where President Ronald Reagan had just addressed 5,000 members of the AFL-CIO.

As Reagan emerged from the hotel, Hinckley fired six shots from a revolver. One bullet ricocheted off Reagan’s limousine and struck him beneath his arm. White House Press Secretary James Brady, police officer Thomas Delahanty and Secret Service agent Timothy McCarthy were also wounded.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump; Scott MacFarlane
Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images; CNN

Journalist Reveals Just How Much Money Has Been Diverted From National Parks For Trump's Vanity Projects—And People Are Livid

In a series of articles for MacFarlane News and MeidasTouch, videos, and an appearance on CNN, Chief Washington Correspondent for MeidasTouch Scott MacFarlane blew the whistle on MAGA Republican President Donald Trump’s raiding of National Park Service (NPS) funds. Aided by his Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, Trump diverted NPS money to pay for all of his White House and Washington D.C. vanity projects.

Trump’s hand-selected, mostly unwanted and unnecessary White House grounds and National Mall projects—things like a botched reflecting pool resurfacing, golden decor, a helipad, a ballroom, gilded statues, and giant flagpoles—alone took $423 million from major national parks across the country.

Keep ReadingShow less
Woman using hair tie
aire images/Getty Images

Engaged Woman Sparks Theories After Finding Strange Hair Tie Near Her And Fiancé's Home Entryway

Finding out that your partner is cheating doesn't always have to involve accidentally seeing a nefarious text message or walking in on the act. But sometimes, signs of what could be cheating might have a far stranger explanation.

Posting in the "Girl Dinner Diaries" subReddit, Redditor Jack-of-not posted a photo of an open-faced sandwich and explained what she'd discovered:

Keep ReadingShow less