Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

The Supreme Court Just Smacked Down Texas on Abortion

The Supreme Court Just Smacked Down Texas on Abortion

[DIGEST: NBC, Reuters]

In a 5-3 ruling hailed as a victory by abortions rights activists, the United States Supreme Court struck down a Texas law that critics contend would have forced more than three-quarters of the state’s clinics to close their doors.


The Republican-backed law, passed in 2013, required clinics providing abortion services to meet the same building standards as ambulatory surgical centers. The law also required doctors performing abortion services to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals. Since the law’s enactment, the number of clinics providing abortion services in Texas dropped to 19 from 42. Opponents stressed that number would drop as low as ten if the Supreme Court upheld the restrictions.

The Court held that state legislation cannot place an “undue burden” on a woman’s constitutional right to end her pregnancy, as established in 1973’s landmark Roe v. Wade decision. Texas challenged this standard for assessing abortion limits, first announced by the Supreme Court in 1992’s Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which associated an abortion’s legality with fetal viability. Texas argued that the restrictions aimed to protect the mother and not the life of the fetus. The restrictions were put in place “to ensure patient safety and raise standards of care.”

[embed]

[/embed]

The Center of Reproductive Rights, however, accused the Texas legislature of overreach, arguing that abortion patients rarely require hospitalization––if any. The surgical procedure typically lasts ten minutes without general anesthesia in the outpatient setting of a doctor’s office or clinic, and complications are rare.

The court’s decision imperils laws in 12 other states. Some of these laws are currently on hold due to court challenges.

More from News

A woman looking at a group of people on a sidewalk
woman standing in the middle of crowd
Photo by Jason W on Unsplash

People Break Down The Most Bizarre Coincidences They Have Ever Experienced

There are those who go through life believing everything happens for a reason, that our destinies are all planned out by a power bigger than us, and our lives are ultimately driven by fate.

Then there are others who don't believe that one bit, and chalk up anything others might call "fate" or "destiny" to merely being a coincidence.

Keep ReadingShow less
Janet Jackson
Gilbert Carrasquillo/GC Images/GettyImages

Janet Jackson Hilariously Explains Why She Hates Being Interviewed—And We Totally Get It

Pop icon and actor Janet Jackson had a very candid response to being asked an interview question, and the internet didn't hate her for it.

The "Rhythm Nation" singer continues to perform since establishing herself early in the 1980s as an artistic force to be reckoned with in her own right, independent of her family's musical legacy.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of 'Family Feud' episode
'Family Feud'

'Celebrity Family Feud' Question About Greatest Rapper Of All Time Sparks Intense Debate

People online were shocked by answers during recent episode of Celebrity Family Feud, and honestly, their arguments were more than valid.

Celebrity contestants Tori Kelly and Meghan Trainor, along with their families, struggled to fill the board housing survey results of the "greatest rapper of all time"... but it wasn't completely their fault.

Keep ReadingShow less
Lauren Boebert; Donald Trump; Kamala Harris
Nathan Howard/Getty Images; Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images; Al Drago/Getty Images

Boebert Swiftly Fact-Checked After Using Old Trump Donation To Harris To Prove He Isn't Racist'

Colorado Republican Representative Lauren Boebert was swiftly fact-checked after using a $5,000 check former President Donald Trump once wrote to support Vice President Kamala Harris' re-election campaign as Attorney General of California as proof he can't be racist.

Boebert's action came after President Joe Biden dropped out of the 2024 race and endorsed Harris. At 81, Biden faced increasing concerns within his party about his age and capacity to serve another term, along with fears of a potential loss to former President Donald Trump—who is 78—in November.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots of Donald Trump and Kamala Harris
@KamalaHarris/X

2019 Kamala Harris Ad Explains Why She Is 'The Anti-Trump'—And People Can't Believe How Perfect It Is

A 2019 Kamala Harris for President ad that points out that she "prosecuted sex predators" and that former President Donald Trump "is one" has resurfaced after President Joe Biden dropped out of the 2024 race and endorsed Harris as his successor.

The video, which refers to Harris as the "anti-Trump," was originally produced during Harris’ bid for the 2020 Democratic nomination, highlights her accomplishments as a prosecutor—and demonstrates that Trump is exactly the type of person she would have prosecuted for his sex crimes.

Keep ReadingShow less