Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Lawyers Break Down The Hardest Client They Ever Had To Defend In Court

Lawyers Break Down The Hardest Client They Ever Had To Defend In Court
Image by succo from Pixabay

Everyone is always looking for a lawyer. It can be difficult to find and settle on one; there are quite a few reasons why lawyers don't take certain cases. There could be no money to be made from your case, first and foremost. Other lawyers could have rejected the case or the statute of limitations could have expired. The case could just be weak.

This isn't to say that lawyers take open and shut casework, but they certainly don't want to take on clients who will make their lives more difficult, either.

After Redditor gallimimus asked the online community, "Lawyers of Reddit: Who was your hardest client to defend in court?" people shared their stories.


"One of my clients..."

One of my clients stabbed a McDonald's employee through the drive-thru window and when he was arrested they found four grams of powdered morphine in his sock.

HerbenDadon

"Had a woman..."

Had a woman charged with violating a no-contact order. The order said that she wasn't to come within 100 yards of her ex's house. Cops pull up to ex's house and she's standing in the front yard, waving her arms and screaming.

I was wracking my brain for something to argue to the jury as a reason to find her not guilty. Didn't really come up with much.

AverageAtuin

"The owner..."

Workplace accident caused the death of a worker. I represented the company, defending against charges of negligence, various health and safety violations. The owner clearly didn't take safety seriously and constantly complained about how this was hurting his business.

Mondaxter

"My hardest clients..."

I do family law. My hardest clients are the ones that low key alienate their children from an ex over personal feelings. They don't see it or why the behavior is a problem and they are usually very unlikeable people. Don't get me wrong, I have repped bad people who still manage to be likeable, but not these walnuts.

YeetOrBeYeetenEsq

"And this was all after refusing..."

Got a DUI client who had kicked his trial date down by almost two years. Had a history of DUI but had cleaned up his act until this one.

His story: he was sitting in his car waiting for a ride when he got picked up, no keys in the ignition, talked to the cops by opening the door, no way he could have hoped to drive the thing.

Cops' story: keys were in the ignition and the window was down. No one disputing that he was wasted.

His case was winnable but for one thing - he couldn't close his damn trap shut on the stand. If I asked him the time, he told me where his watch was made and what the name of the clerk was who sold it to him. Classic mouth-diarrhea sufferer.

His friends were his other witnesses, and I couldn't have asked for better ones. The police were the prosecutor's witnesses, and I poked holes in their testimony left and right. The case was far from an airtight acquittal, but I had more than enough reasonable doubt to win...

...except for my client. Who revealed on the stand that it was his fourth DUI - when, as far as anyone on the jury was concerned, it was his first. Then he couldn't keep his story straight on how he talked to the cop - opening the window vs cracking the door (makes a difference because the key would have had to be in the ignition for the windows to roll down.) And if I tried to rein him in, he went off on another tangent.

And this was all after refusing to plead to a stipulated first offense, which would have been fines and traffic school - instead, he torpedoed his own case, got convicted, got something like 60 days in jail and a ton of costs, and I got frustratingly close to a win.

ArmyMedicalCrab

"One of the kids..."

Lawyer here. I don't normally do litigation, but as a pro bono project (and for some experience doing a different kind of law), I served as guardian ad litem for these two kids stuck in a high-conflict child custody dispute. "Guardian ad litem" basically means that the court-appointed me to represent the kids whose parents are fighting over them (this is oversimplifying slightly). In other words, I didn't represent either parent, but both parents wanted me on "their side" since my opinion of the case would be influential with the judge.

It was a complete s*** show. Both parents were low income, basically living off of various forms of government assistance. Each had several other kids with other partners. The mom said that the dad sold drugs and that both kids were conceived via assault (and the dad was recently out of prison for sexual assault); the dad said that the mom is a prostitute who neglected the kids (and there were various reports from the kids' school that corroborated this). One of the kids (the sister) was super cute, but the other (the brother) called his sister a hoe in open court and said he hated her.

Luckily the parents agreed to a joint custody arrangement before it went to trial. This experienced confirmed for me 1000% that I do not want to be a litigator, especially in family court.

Saguaromatic

"The guy who told the judge..."

The guy who told the judge he was going to strangle me in front of jury if he didn't remove me from his case.

Saguaromatic

"Somehow..."

Client showed up drunk for a preliminary hearing on DWI. Had him wait in hall, told the judge he was out there. I didn't mention he was drunk. Somehow convinced the judge to continue prelim based on the total creative concoction. If he'd come in the judge would have locked him up for public intoxication and been hot at DWI sentencing. Maybe the judge remembered his pre-bench days just gave us a break.

MidwestAmMan

"In the end..."

I was defending in a DUI case where the guy argued that the reason there was alcohol in his blood is that the cops used alcoholic hand sanitizers when arresting him and the alcohol was on his skin where the needle went... due to the ethical code of the bar association, I had to ask several questions about this from an expert witness who had 20 yrs of medical experience, the witness kind of understood why I had to ask these insane questions; nonetheless I felt like a moron.

In the end, I could still get a better sentence than his plea deal.

Endymion2748

"Clients who keep breaching..."

Clients who keep breaching their restraining orders or mutual no-contact orders. I'm a family lawyer, so I'm not defending them when they're charged for it, but those charges then mess with their careers or get brought up later when we're trying to figure out parenting.

LJoftheLaw

Want to "know" more? Never miss another big, odd, funny, or heartbreaking moment again. Sign up for the Knowable newsletter here.

More from Trending/best-of-reddit

Screenshots from @kristin_schnacky's TikTok video
@kristin_schnacky/TikTok

Bride In Tears After NYC Firefighters Surprise Her At Her Wedding To Honor Her Dad Who Died On 9/11

On September 11, 2001, 343 firefighters were lost while responding to the terrorist attacks on the Twin Towers in New York City.

Among them was New York Firefighter Kenneth Marino, who made it up 78 floors of the North Tower, and whose helmet has since been preserved.

Keep ReadingShow less
Cardi B
@JenniferHudsonShow/YouTube

Cardi B Goes Viral After Revealing The Hilarious Reason She Wants To Have More Kids

For those not keeping up with her life, the words "Cardi B" and "kids" might not be the first two things that come to mind.

However, the rap artist has three children, with two of them coming during her work on her latest album, which is out September 19th. Cardi B already had one daughter, Kulture, who has been joined by siblings in the recent years.

Keep ReadingShow less
Apple iPhone 17 crossbody strap reaction
Apple; @damjandano/X

Apple Just Announced A $60 Crossbody Strap For The iPhone 17—And Here Come The Jokes

What's the number one thing you most want out of a new iPhone?

Perhaps a screen that doesn't shatter if you breathe on it too hard? A battery that doesn't begin malfunctioning six months in?

Keep ReadingShow less
Nancy Mace; Sara Jacobs
Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images; C-SPAN

Nancy Mace Melts Down After Dem Rep. Points Out That Cosmetic Procedures Are 'Gender-Affirming Care'

On Wednesday, California Democratic Representative Sara Jacobs decided to address the elephant in the room—the GOP in general and self-described "proud transphobe" South Carolina MAGA Republican Representative Nancy Mace in particular—over their hypocrisy regarding gender-affirming healthcare procedures.

Mace is trying to amend a Defense Department funding measure to ban gender-affirming care for military members and their dependents, among other anti-LGBTQ+ budget amendments.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Nancy Mace; Charlie Kirk
The Daily Caller; Nordin Catic/Getty Images for The Cambridge Union

Nancy Mace Ripped After Using Transgender Slur To Refer To Charlie Kirk Killer

South Carolina Republican Representative Nancy Mace was fiercely criticized following the assassination of far-right activist Charlie Kirk when she used a slur to reference the rumored gender identity of the killer, who has yet to be identified by authorities.

Since Kirk's killing on Wednesday, Mace has erroneously claimed that rhetoric from Democrats is responsible for Kirk's death—and now she's taken the opportunity to once again attack transgender people, saying with no evidence whatsoever that "the shooter was a tr*nny, or pro-tr*nny."

Keep ReadingShow less