Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Former Trump Official Awkwardly Contradicts His Own Book's Claim After Trump Calls It 'Fake News'

Former Trump Official Awkwardly Contradicts His Own Book's Claim After Trump Calls It 'Fake News'
Newsmax

In his upcoming book, former President Donald Trump's ex-chief of staff, Mark Meadows, reveals that Trump tested positive for COVID-19 days before his first debate with then-Democratic nominee Joe Biden. According to Meadows, Trump took another test that delivered a negative result.

In the following days, Trump held a rally, met with Gold Star families, and debated Biden.


By October 2, Trump announced that he and former First Lady Melania Trump tested positive for COVID-19.

The revelation that Trump tested positive earlier than previously known—and continued to potentially endanger those around him—sparked national outcry, prompting Trump to release a statement.

Predictably, he called Meadows' book "Fake News":

“The story of me having COVID prior to, or during, the first debate is Fake News. In fact, a test revealed that I did not have COVID prior to the debate.”

Noticeably absent from Trump's statement was an attack against Meadows, who scrambled to remain in the former President's good graces by appearing on the far-right disinformation outlet, Newsmax.

Watch below.

Like so many Republicans before him, Meadows sacrificed his own credibility to preserve ties with Trump, saying:

"The President's right, it's fake news. If you actually read the book, the context of it, that story outlined a false positive. Literally had a test, had two other tests after that that showed he didn't have COVID during the debate, and yet the way that the media wants to spin it is certainly to be as negative about Donald Trump as they possibly can while giving Joe Biden a pass."

In a rare display of journalistic acumen for Newsmax, anchor Rob Schmitt pressed Meadows on the timing. Trump, according to Meadows, took two negative tests after initially testing positive, but only six days later would be treated for COVID-19 at Walter Reed.

Meadows stammered then pivoted:

"Any time that we look at things and we look at tests and we look at what happened, it's certainly, uh, that's what I outline in the book and talk about that Walter Reed visit, but there's a lot of great stories in the book that candidly talk about the miraculous work, the historic work that Donald Trump did."

But Meadows' own book counteracts the position that Trump's staffers were confident he was negative, though he writes Trump took the negative test as “full permission to press on as if nothing had happened.” Meanwhile, Meadows adds that he instructed everyone in his circle to treat Trump as though he were positive.

What's more, there are questions surrounding the supposedly negative tests Trump later took.

Social media users decried Meadows for his frantic backtracking.





They were not convinced.



Soon, Meadows will walk another tightrope testing his loyalty to Trump. He's one of the only Trump administration officials cooperating with the House Select Committee investigating the January 6 insurrection, which Trump has been working to stonewall.

More from People/donald-trump

Kate Gosselin
Slaven Vlasic/Getty Images

Kate Gosselin Shares The 'Lasting Effects' Of Having Sextuplets On Her Body—And We Can Only Imagine

TLC programming was a major part of Millennial and Gen-X culture, particularly shows like Teen Mom, Catfish, Jon & Kate Plus 8, and Keeping Up with the Kardashians.

If you were ever curious for a closer glimpse of Kate Gosselin, mother of twins and then sextuplets, and her life, now is your chance!

Keep ReadingShow less
screenshot of Donald Trump and Kamala Harris presidential debate
CNN

Video Of Kamala Warning Trump About Putin's Agenda Goes Viral After Russian Drones Enter Polish Airspace

One year ago, pundits and the press were analyzing the performances of Democratic presidential candidate Vice President Kamala Harris and former President and MAGA Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump in the first and only debate between the pair before the 2024 presidential election.

During that face-off, it was noted that Trump refused to answer if he wanted United States ally Ukraine to win the war Russia began by invading their neighbor.

Keep ReadingShow less
An 87-year-old Gramercy Park man and his wife fought off a pair of watch thieves in a scam gone wrong.
Eyewitness News ABC7NY/YouTube

87-Year-Old Foils Watch Thieves

Who needs another season of Mr. and Mrs. Smith when Gramercy Park’s own Larry Schwartz and Joanna Cuccia are already serving action-comedy gold? At 87, Schwartz casually knocks out 240 reps a day and chases off watch thieves as if it were just another warm-up set.

And Larry Schwartz wasn’t about to let some Rolex-swapping grifter make him the punchline of a TikTok crime wave.

Keep ReadingShow less
Anna Wintour Reveals Her Honest Reaction To Seeing 'The Devil Wears Prada'—And It's Kind Of Iconic
Gilbert Carrasquillo/GC Images; 20th Century Fox

Anna Wintour Reveals Her Honest Reaction To Seeing 'The Devil Wears Prada'—And It's Kind Of Iconic

If you've ever wondered if legendary Vogue Editor-in-Chief Anna Wintour has ever seen The Devil Wears Prada, the answer is yes, and she's finally shared her opinions on the film.

The movie, based on Lauren Weisberger's novel of the same name, centers around the trials and tribulations a young writer endures under a legendarily icy fashion editor named Miranda Priestley.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots of Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Colbert, and crowd giving standing ovation
CBS

Powerful Line From Sotomayor's Scathing Dissent After ICE Ruling Ignites Standing Ovation On 'Colbert'

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor received a standing ovation during her appearance on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert after Colbert read a line from her powerful dissent following the Court's ruling that immigration agents can use racial profiling when conducting arrests.

The case was brought by several individuals detained during ICE raids. A federal district judge initially found the raids unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Keep ReadingShow less