Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Former Trump Impeachment Lawyer Previously Removed Black Jurors Using Blatantly Racist Stereotypes

Former Trump Impeachment Lawyer Previously Removed Black Jurors Using Blatantly Racist Stereotypes
Greg Harris/Facebook

One of the core attorneys in former President Donald Trump's now disbanded legal team for his second impeachment trial had a history of using racial stereotypes to remove Black citizens from serving on juries.

The attorney in question, Greg Harris of South Carolina, was one of four leading attorneys who were part of Trump's second impeachment legal team. The team of attorneys abruptly quit Saturday with just over a week to go before the trial.


Harris—who confirmed his hiring to the Associated Press this past Thursday—had given racial stereotypes as reasoning to remove one juror going so far as to say they "shucked and jived" as they walked. A telling fit for a President who has called White supremacists "fine people" and shouted out to the Proud Boys, a known hate group, during the recent Presidential debates.

In 1989, when Harris served as an assistant solicitor for the 5th Judicial Circuit Solicitor's Office, the South Carolina Supreme Court ruled Harris used racist stereotypes against two Black jurors in a DUI case.

The attorney for the defendant in the DUI case, Phillip Mace, told HuffPost through the two trials 9 out of 10 strikes used by Harris were against potential jurors who were Black.

Mace recalled Harris response to him. He said:

"When I challenged him on it, Greg said he didn't have a racist or [discriminatory] bone in his body. I remember that."

In this case Harris struck one Black man from the jury pool because he said he walked slow, talked low, and was older. When striking another potential juror in the same case Harris told the trial judge it was because the man was unemployed, disinterested and "shucked and jived".

Harris stated:

"I watched him as he walked from the jury panel to the microphone and I have noted that he ― he shucked and jived is what I had. That's just my analysis of the way he walked up here."

After the trial court failed to substantiate the claim Harris displayed a pattern of racial bias the South Carolina Supreme Court ruled on the case calling Harris' use of racial stereotypes "troublesome."

The South Carolina Supreme Court said in the ruling:

"The trial court failed to inquire into or comment on the prosecutor's explanation that the juror was struck because he 'shucked and jived.' The use of this racial stereotype is evidence of the prosecutor's subjective intent to discriminate."

Mace applauded the Supreme Court's decision saying it started a "sea change" in a state with a history of violent racism.

Twitter users were unsurprised at Trump's choice of Harris for his legal team.






Greg Harris had not responded to inquiries for comment as of this writing.

More from People/donald-trump

Screenshot of JD Vance; Donald Trump
@Acyn/X; Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

JD Vance Just Said The Quiet Part Out Loud About What Trump Really 'Takes Seriously' As President—And Yep, That Tracks

In his announcement this week that the Trump administration will be withholding $1.3 billion in Medicaid payments from California due to alleged fraud, Vice President JD Vance had people raising their eyebrows after claiming that President Donald Trump "takes fraud seriously."

As part of his role overseeing anti-fraud efforts, Vance said the administration is targeting California because state officials are not taking Medicaid fraud seriously enough. Vance claimed both California and American taxpayers were being “defrauded” and alleged that some patients had been given unnecessary medications after fraudsters encouraged “false prescriptions” and improper treatment.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots from @itsgoobz's TikTok video
@itsgoobz/TikTok

Woman Goes Viral After Revealing How She Caught Her Husband Cheating Thanks To His iCloud Account

Cheating is an absolute dealbreaker in most relationships—but when you add three children to the mix, it escalates to a level of betrayal that there's really no coming back from.

It's even worse when the cheater does little to apologize for or even acknowledge what they have done.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots from @maggieeatsss's TikTok video
@maggieeatsss/TikTok

Mom Goes Viral After Confronting Her Son About His Bullying Behavior At School—And Parents Are Applauding

Parents might not want to think about it or talk about it, but at some point, their children are going to make some mistakes, and the true test of their parenting is how they respond in those moments.

So when TikToker @maggieeatsss found out that her son had been bullying a kid at school, she knew there was no time to waste.

Keep ReadingShow less
North Carolina Mom Slams MAGA Congresswoman For Attacking Her 10-Year-Old Son And His Teacher In 'Horrific' Letter
FOX8 WGHP/YouTube; Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

North Carolina Mom Slams MAGA Congresswoman For Attacking Her 10-Year-Old Son And His Teacher In 'Horrific' Letter

Greensboro, North Carolina, mother Emily Mango is upset with MAGA Republican Representative Virginia Foxx over a letter the North Carolina legislator sent to her 10-year-old son in response to a school assignment.

Mango shared that her son Christian, who is in the 4th grade, was tasked with a writing exercise. Students were to compose a persuasive essay on a topic of their choosing and send it to a changemaker.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hayden Panettiere
On Purpose with Jay Shetty; Neutrogena

Hayden Panettiere Claims Neutrogena Fired Her After 10 Years For Speaking About Postpartum Depression—And Fans Are Appalled

Despite being in an industry that many people only dream of, Heroes and Bring It On star Hayden Panettiere hasn't had the best of luck.

With her memoir This Is Me: A Reckoning coming out soon, Panettiere has been opening up about her experiences with discrimination and abuse, this time on the On Purpose with Jay Shetty podcast, shedding light on one very popular skincare line.

Keep ReadingShow less