Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Kevin McCarthy Is Desperate And Lashing Out—What That Could Mean For The Rest Of Us

Kevin McCarthy
Alex Wong/Getty Images

The consequences of his concessions to the far-right are very troubling and could put us on a road no one wants to go down for the next two years.

It wasn’t supposed to be like this for California Republican Representative Kevin McCarthy. Before the dissipation of the mighty Red Wave by Republicans in the midterm elections, he was a shoo-in for Speaker, with predictions of as many as 60 seats flipped in the House.

Today, that margin is just five seats and it spells big trouble for his ambitions.


That’s because a bloc of five “Never Kevin” far-right Republicans have pledged to vote together as a unit, with an unknown further number of claimed supporters. They have made it clear they will not support McCarthy’s bid and instead have demanded to elect a conservative, along with all manner of rule changes that would increase the bloc’s own power in the House.

This includes reviving a rule that would make it far easier to topple the Speaker at any time, effectively giving them veto power over who holds the gavel.

McCarthy understandably has refused to budge on this question; after all, what good is becoming Speaker if at the first point of disagreement, the extremists can move to vote you out?

And so, in what feels like an increasingly desperate bid to win the support of the far-right, McCarthy has taken to groveling in all manner of unseemly ways, including cozying up to the likes of Republican Representative Majorie Taylor Greene and promising choice committee assignments.

It means kissing Trump’s ring and staying in his good graces, even while rallying more centrist members to his cause. Their support is admittedly less for McCarthy than it is an acknowledgement of the lack of any viable alternative.

Thus was born the cringey “O.K.” button campaign, where moderates have pledged that they are “Only Kevin”—because, well, he’s pretty much also “O.K.” for the job.

McCarthy’s groveling has apparently extended to going along with a broad and unprecedented attack upon his Senate colleagues. As a bipartisan group in the Senate hammers out a gigantic, end-of-year omnibus spending package, the Freedom Caucus and other far-right Representatives are howling mad.

They had fought hard to defeat the bill but didn’t have the votes in Nancy Pelosi’s House, which ends in January. Lacking the votes to stop the bill, they have now resorted to childish threats.

On Monday, they warned in a letter, ultimately signed by 31 of them, that any Republican who votes for the spending bill would never see one of their own bills taken up by the House.

They even took a direct swipe at GOP Senate Minority Leader McConnell:

“We are obliged to inform you that if any omnibus passes in the remaining days of this Congress, we will oppose and whip opposition to any legislative priority of those senators who vote for this bill—including the Republican leader.”

In a tweet, McCarthy endorsed the letter on Tuesday, stating:

“Agreed. Except no need to whip—when I’m Speaker, their bills will be dead on arrival in the House if this nearly $2 [trillion] monstrosity is allowed to move forward.”

It is an unprecedented flex for a leader of a party in one chamber to openly threaten the legislative priorities of the leader of the same party in the other chamber, yet here we are, witnessing McCarthy’s humiliating, performative tantrum.

The stakes are high.

The budget bill includes $45 billion in aid for Ukraine, which if not passed this session may not get through the House in the next, due largely to opposition from a handful of staunch anti-Ukraine funding House members including the Never Kevins.

The bill also contains provisions amending the Electoral Count Act to prevent a repeat of January 6 by making it harder for members of Congress to object to election results and designating state governors as the final word on certification of electors. This was a hard-fought reform that has at long last received broad bipartisan support.

The bill needs to pass before the body breaks for the holidays, but it is currently stalled over a question of immigration reform under Title 42, raised by hard core anti-migrant crusader Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee.

If ultimately passed, the bill will fund the government through September 2023. Kentucky GOP Senator Mitch McConnell, and likely McCarthy at least privately, want the bill to pass now so that the new Congress doesn’t spend its first few months playing hot potato with the budget.

Given the uncertainty over McCarthy’s House leadership bid, having the budget also still unresolved could paralyze the government entirely, leading to shutdowns and chaos.

Of course, this kind of brinksmanship, with government shutdowns and chaos as leverage, is precisely what the Freedom Caucus and the Never Kevins want in order to test their own political strength.

By throwing his lot in with them, at least on paper, McCarthy hopes to keep their crucial support, thus necessitating these embarrassing salvos against his own colleagues.

But few over in the Senate take his threat to blacklist GOP bill supporters very seriously.

Alabama Republican Senator Richard Shelby—vice chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee and the top negotiator on the omnibus bill—said to Axios:

“He’s focused on being Speaker, and if I were in his shoes that’s what I would be focused on, trying to get enough votes."
"But I don't think that intimidates anyone.”

Utah GOP Senator Mitt Romney was less charitable when he said:

“We're enduring the silly season of the campaign."
"[For] most of us that's over after you get elected, but he's running for Speaker of the House, so the silliness is still evident.”

More from News

Charlize Theron (left) responds to Timothée Chalamet’s (right) controversial comments about ballet and opera.
Steve Granitz/FilmMagic; Jamie McCarthy/WireImage

Charlize Theron Gives Timothée Chalamet A Blunt Reality Check About His Future After His Comments Insulting Ballet

Timothée Chalamet declaring that “no one cares” about ballet and opera was always going to age poorly. It just happened faster than expected.

Enter Charlize Theron, who didn’t just disagree—she flipped the whole argument, suggesting that while centuries-old art forms will endure, Chalamet’s own career may be far more vulnerable in the age of artificial intelligence.

Keep ReadingShow less
Caitlyn Jenner; Donald Trump
Frazer Harrison/Getty Images; Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images

Caitlyn Jenner Slammed For Hypocrisy After Revealing That She Asked Trump To Fix Gender On Her Passport So She Can Travel Again

Former Olympian Caitlyn Jenner recently revealed she can no longer travel internationally after the Trump administration's new passport policy required her to be marked as "male," and is receiving backlash for writing a letter to President Donald Trump asking him to get it changed.

Jenner, a transgender woman, has long aligned herself with the MAGA movement, which is diametrically opposed to LGBTQ+ equality and has led an attack against transgender rights that culminated in legislation banning or restricting gender-affirming care in GOP-led legislatures in more than half the country.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots from @oz11201's TikTok video
@oz11201/TikTok

Hero Oklahoma Principal Crowned Prom King In Emotional Viral Video After Tackling Would-Be School Shooter

On April 7, Pauls Valley High School in Oklahoma was breached by twenty-year-old Victor Hawkins, a former student who showed up at the school armed with a gun.

Fortunately, upon his entry into the school, Principal Kirk Moore did not hesitate to full-body tackle him and disarm him, keeping him down until authorities arrived, all while sustaining a shot to the leg.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Donald Trump
C-SPAN

Trump Dragged After Making Bizarre Joke About His Age—And, Yeah, He Wishes

79-year-old President Donald Trump had people raising their eyebrows after he, during a discussion about Social Security, tried to claim—jokingly, one hopes—that he's "not a senior" citizen.

Trump, who turns 80 in June, was discussing his administration's pledge that Social Security benefits would be tax-free when he claimed that "seniors are loving me" and proceeded to ramble incoherently.

Keep ReadingShow less
Joshua Jackson reacts to an unexpectedly awkward question about his father.
@paceybanks/X

Joshua Jackson Was Just Asked About The 'Best Advice' He Got From His Dad—But There's One Awkward Problem

What started as a standard red carpet question quickly veered into uncomfortable territory when Dawson’s Creek star Joshua Jackson was asked about advice from a father who wasn’t actually part of his life. Jackson has long been open about his difficult non-relationship with his father, John Carter.

Back in 1998, Jackson spoke candidly to The Seattle Times about his parents’ divorce, describing it as a turning point in his childhood.

Keep ReadingShow less