Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Dem Rep. Masterfully Debunks Trump's Bizarre New 'Free Speech' Defense

Dan Goldman; Donald Trump
Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images; Scott Olson/Getty Images

Rep. Daniel Goldman rips apart the claim that Donald Trump and his allies are making that he's being indicted for 'free speech.'

New York Democratic Representative Dan Goldman masterfully debunked a claim from one of former President Donald Trump's lawyers, who asserted Trump is being indicted for exercising his right to "free speech" after he was indicted in connection with his widespread efforts to overturn the 2020 election result.

Trump's attorney, John Lauro, has strongly denounced the indictment brought against the former president, asserting that it constitutes an assault on "free speech" and "political speech."


Lauro made these statements during an interview on CNN Tuesday evening, characterizing the charges as an unprecedented attack on fundamental constitutional rights.

You can hear what Lauro said in the video below.

Lauro claimed the indictment was politically motivated designed to suppress his client's free speech.

“Our defense is going to be focusing on the fact that what we have now is an administration that has criminalized the free speech and advocacy of a prior administration during the time that there’s a political election going on. That’s unprecedented.”

He also raised concerns about the potential duration of the legal proceedings resulting from the indictment handed down by Special Counsel Jack Smith.

“I can see it lasting nine months or a year, but Mr. Trump is entitled to a defense. The government has had three years to investigate this, and now they want to rush this to trial in the middle of a political season."
“For the government to have three years to do it and then expect us to do it in three weeks or four weeks is just ridiculous.”

When challenged by CNN anchor Kaitlan Collins—who pointed out that the First Amendment does not permit Trump to "claim there was fraud when he was told there was no fraud and then try to subvert the election by overturning legitimate electors"—Lauro was defiant, insisting that it "protects all speech."

Shortly afterward, Goldman fired back on Twitter to shut down Lauro's claims about the integrity of the First Amendment.

"The First Amendment protects Donald Trump if he simply makes knowingly false statements about election fraud."
"The First Amendment does not protect Donald Trump if he corruptly attempts to persuade, coerce or direct others to ACT on his knowingly false beliefs."

You can see Goldman's tweet below.

Many have praised Goldman's response and echoed his assessment.







Trump faces four felony counts, including conspiracy to defraud the United States and conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding.

The indictment further accuses Trump of attempting to exploit the events of January 6, 2021—the violent assault on Congress—to further his quest to maintain power.

Lauro—who recently joined Trump's legal team—has consistently framed the federal investigations and indictments against the former President as politically motivated.

He reiterated this perspective during a separate appearance on Fox News, emphasizing the need for the prosecution to prove Trump's belief in the falsity of the allegations.

More from People/donald-trump

Donald Trump with King Willem-Alexander of the Netherlands and Queen Maxima
Brendan Smialowski - Pool/Getty Images

Dutch Queen Appears To Mockingly Mimic Trump Right In Front Of Him In Hilarious Viral Video

Queen Maxima of the Netherlands has gone viral after she was caught on video appearing to mock the way President Donald Trump speaks while he was in conversation with her and her husband King Willem-Alexander at the Huis ten Bosch Palace in The Hague, where world leaders have attended the NATO summit.

The moment came as Trump spoke to Williem-Alexander to thank the royal couple for their hospitality. The Queen was actively listening to the two men talk but then turned her face toward the cameras, twisting her mouth to resemble Trump's speaking style.

Keep ReadingShow less

Teachers Share The Questions Students Asked In Class That Broke Their Hearts

Being a teacher is a calling.

It is not for the meek or weak of heart.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Emily Compagno
Fox News

Fox Host Slams Dem For Dropping An F-Bomb After Praising Trump For The Same Thing Just Minutes Earlier

Fox News host Emily Compagno was criticized after she praised Donald Trump's use of the "f-bomb" earlier this week before condemning Texas Democratic Representative Jasmine Crockett's use of the same word—on the same episode of her show, no less.

Trump made headlines this week after admonishing Israel and Iran for violating a ceasefire agreement he'd announced on Truth Social. Although he claimed the ceasefire had been "agreed upon," Iran fired at least six missile barrages at Israel after it was supposed to take effect.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ken Jennings; Emily Croke
@Jeopardy/Instagram

Champ's Wild Final Jeopardy Connection

In a dramatic conclusion on last Monday’s Jeopardy!, a contestant revealed a surprising relationship to the final clue's answer. Hailing from Denver, Emily Croke made it to the final write-in portion of the game show with $12,200 in earnings.

In the category of “Collections,” host Ken Jennings read the clue:

Keep ReadingShow less
State Department logo illustration
Thomas Fuller/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

State Department Slammed After Requiring Visa Applicants To Make All Social Media Posts Public For Vetting

The State Department is facing harsh criticism after it announced that anyone applying for an F, M, or J nonimmigrant visa will need to disclose all social media profiles from the last five years, requiring that all applicants set their posts to public so they can be properly vetted by its agents.

The agency said the new rules are part of a new screening process aimed at identifying individuals who may pose a threat to U.S. national security. According to the department, failure to comply could result in a denial, and consular officers have been instructed to flag signs of “hostility” toward the U.S.—though the criteria for such determinations remain vague.

Keep ReadingShow less