Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Trump Asks Supreme Court to Block Mueller Investigation Grand Jury Materials and Everyone Has the Same Question

Trump Asks Supreme Court to Block Mueller Investigation Grand Jury Materials and Everyone Has the Same Question
(Photos by Jim Watson/AFP and Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Make us preferred on Google

The investigation into Russia's meddling int the 2016 presidential elections—and the Trump campaign's documented welcoming of it—may seem like a lifetime ago, but the saga isn't completely over just yet.

After special counsel Robert Mueller said that there wasn't enough evidence to charge the Trump campaign with conspiracy, Trump and his allies falsely hailed the development as a complete and total exoneration.


Trump repeatedly called the basic oversight a "hoax" and a "witch hunt," but a recent move by the Trump administration signals that there's still something to hide.

After the D.C. Circuit Appeals Court paved the way for Congress to receive sealed grand jury materials from the investigation, the Trump administration is imploring the Supreme Court to put a hold on the release of the records to Congress.

Solicitor General Noel Francisco lamented that if the documents were revealed:

"[T]he government will have to disclose those materials on May 11, 2020, which would irrevocably lift their secrecy and possibly frustrate the government's ability to seek further review."

It's par for the course for the Trump administration not to comply with Congressional oversight. You'll recall that the White House didn't abide by congressionally approved subpoenas and it instructed any witnesses subpoenaed by House committees to do the same, especially during the impeachment inquiry against the President. Their argument against this oversight was that it was for the courts to determine whether or not these subpoenas were valid.

These extensive efforts to conceal information from Congress beg the question.

If Trump has been "totally exonerated" from charges in these "hoaxes," what is the reason for hiding?





The decision of whether or not to grant a stay lies with the Supreme Court—where two Trump-appointed justices sit.




Elections have consequences. Are you registered to vote?

More from People/donald-trump

Ariana Grande
Taylor Hill/FilmMagic

Ariana Grande Caught Liking Instagram Post Hilariously Trolling Republicans After Midterms—And Fans Are Applauding

Most celebrities haven't had the gall to stand for anything since Trump took office, but in the wake of Tuesday's midterms some of them are showing exactly where they stand, even if in the subtlest of ways.

Case in point: Ariana Grande, who was caught liking an Instagram post that used one of her performances to hilariously troll Republicans, and fans are loving it.

Keep ReadingShow less
Katie Miller
CBS News

Katie Miller Reveals That She Didn't Actually Vote In The Midterms—And Her Reason Is Getting Major Side-Eye

Controversial Republican President Donald Trump's MAGA movement took a major hit in the midterms.

For some inexplicable reason, Bari Weiss' CBS News decided Katie Miller, the wife of Trump White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy and the Homeland Security Advisor Stephen Miller, was the expert to consult on why Tuesday's results went so badly for her husband's boss and her husband's Project 2025 Christian nationalist, White supremacist agenda.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump
Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images

Dems Share Important Reminder As Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' Is Set To Take Effect In January

After Democrats swept midterm election races to win back both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate in a clear repudiation of the Trump administration, people are sharing reminders that President Donald Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" is set to take effect in January and that Americans could blame Democrats for stipulations Republicans put in the bill.

According to The Washington Post, the bill "includes the biggest reduction of funding for the federal safety net since at least the 1990s, targeting more than $1 trillion in social spending." The Post noted that the $3 trillion package "partially pays for its large price tag by slashing spending on Medicaid and food stamps (SNAP), which congressional Republicans maintain are rife with fraud."

Keep ReadingShow less
James Talarico; Ken Paxton
Sergio Flores/Getty Images; Adam Gray/Getty Images

Texas Election Results Reveal Just How Badly James Talarico Beat Ken Paxton—And We Love To See It

While election results in Texas have still not been fully tallied, the unofficial results have revealed that the election between Democrat James Talarico and Republican Ken Paxton in the race for the U.S. Senate was over before Election Day even hit because Talarico received more early votes than Paxton received in total.

The scale of Talarico’s victory was evident in the early-voting figures. He received 5,444,982 votes overall, including 4,397,474 cast before Election Day. Paxton, by comparison, finished with 4,249,373 votes, of which 3,232,667 were early ballots. In other words, Talarico secured nearly 150,000 more votes during early voting alone than Paxton received across the entire election.

Keep ReadingShow less
Abdul El-Sayed; Mike Rogers
Salwan Georges/Getty Images; Spencer Platt/Getty Images

Abdul El-Sayed Goes Viral After His Election Prediction From May Was Eerily Accurate

After his historic defeat of Michigan Republican Mike Rogers in the state's U.S. Senate race, Democratic Senator-elect Abdul El-Sayed reshared a tweet of his from May in which he correctly predicted he'd "smoke" Rogers "by 7 points."

On May 3, El-Sayed published the following message on X predicting how his race against Rogers would turn out after polling supposedly showed Rogers ahead by several points:

Keep ReadingShow less