Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

U.S. Soccer Argues Women's National Team Doesn't Deserve Equal Pay Because They Are Less Skilled And Have Less 'Responsibility' Than Men

U.S. Soccer Argues Women's National Team Doesn't Deserve Equal Pay Because They Are Less Skilled And Have Less 'Responsibility' Than Men
Howard Smith / ISI Photos / Getty Images

In an attempt to continue paying the U.S. Women's National Team (USWNT) less than their male counterparts despite the team generating more revenue, the US Soccer Federation argued that the women's team are less skilled and their work is less demanding than the men's team.


The argument came as part of a filing on behalf of US Soccer's defense that it has not discriminated against the USWNT, despite paying them less than their male counterparts.

The story doesn't make the US Soccer Federation look good.

The filing argues that the men's team has to be stronger and faster than the USWNT, due to the biological differences between men and women. US Soccer's defense grilled the female players, having them say as much.

In the deposition of Carli Lloyd, a star player for the USWNT, she said of the kind of games men and women play:

"It's different. It's different in the sense that men are bigger, stronger, faster. That's their makeup."

The US Soccer defense also argued that the men's team faced openly hostile fans at home games, which is a different work environment than the women.

All of this is to argue that there is no Equal Pay Act violation, since the circumstance and jobs are different.




Last year, the USWNT filed a lawsuit over equal pay for their players. It became such big news, even Snoop Dogg weighed in.

Despite their amazing games, the USWNT are paid significantly less than if the men's team had similar performance.

While the exact figures for how much each team and player makes are hidden in collective bargaining agreements, some information is out there. For example, in 2018, the men's team had the possibility of a near $10 million prize for winning the world cup, while the USWNT received $110,000 for each player for accomplishing the task.

There is more nuance, as the USWNT receives a set salary of $100,000 per player, while the men's team is paid by game appearances and performance bonuses. However, the men's team has a much higher potential payout than the women because of those higher bonuses.

If the men had the same wins as the USWNT, they'd be getting paid multiple times what the women get. And yet, the men's team has voiced their support for the USWNT's equal pay.

It seems like the only ones who don't want the women to get equal pay are the US Soccer Federation themselves.




From 2016 to 2018, the women's teams brought in $50.8 million in revenue compared to $49.9 million for the men.

And estimates for net profit prove much more in the women's favor. In 2017, a budget report from the US Soccer Federation showed the women's team running a $5 million surplus, while the men's team ran a slight deficit.

And this is only to fight the US Soccer Federation's inequality.

FIFA, the international organization that runs the World Cup, currently awards $30 million as the prize for the Women's champions, compared to $400 million for the men.

FIFA promised to double the women's prize, but they are reportedly also adding $40 million to the men's prize so, there's still a massive difference.

But this lawsuit is still about the US Soccer Federation's unwillingness to pay the men and women's team equally for similar performances.




The lawsuit is currently ongoing, and still has a long way to go. Despite this, the USWNT has already seen improvements in their work environment due to this lawsuit.

At the time of filing, the USWNT was fighting for more games on natural turf over artificial.

From 2014 to 2017, they had to play 13 games on artificial turf, which is harsher on the human body compared to natural. The men's team only had to play 1 game on artificial turf in that same timeframe.

Since the lawsuit, US Soccer has scheduled all the USWNT games on natural turf.

More from Trending

Signal app logo; J.D. Vance
Jaap Arriens/NurPhoto via Getty Images; Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Signal's Founder Epically Roasts Vance Over The Disastrous Group Chat Debacle

Signal founder Matthew Rosenfeld, better known by the pseudonym Moxie Marlinspike, mocked Vice President J.D. Vance after the app found itself at the center of the Trump administration's group text scandal.

Rosenfeld's post came amid revelations that Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg was invited into a Signal chat with high-level Trump administration officials, particularly Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, discussing military strategy surrounding war strikes in Yemen.

Keep ReadingShow less
MTG, Martha Kelner
C-SPAN

MTG Blasted For Her Unhinged Reaction To A UK Reporter Asking Her A Question

Far right Georgia Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene was bashed for viciously shutting down a British reporter who had a question about the Signal group chat scandal, AKA "Signalgate."

Republican President Donald Trump's administration continues to downplay concerns after The Atlantic'seditor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, was mistakenly added to the Signal messaging app's group chat in which U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth shared with top intelligence officials the specific weapons programs regarding the U.S. war strikes on Houthi rebels in Yemen.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Rachel Maddow
MSNBC

Rachel Maddow Gives Trump A Blistering Reality Check After His 'Perfect' Presidency Claims

MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow criticized President Donald Trump after he claimed "we've had two perfect months" to start out his presidency—conveniently downplaying "Signalgate" and ignoring all the scandals that have thus far struck his administration.

You can see his comments to reporters in the video below:

Keep ReadingShow less
train crossing in small town
craig kerwien on Unsplash

People Share Their Most Embarrassing Small Town Stories

I lived most of my life in a very small town in Northern Maine. There were about 200 kids in my high school and there were 56 kids in my graduating class—we were tied with the class of 1961 for the largest class ever.

When the primary employer in town—Pinkham Lumber Mill—shut down, the town got even smaller. Now the senior class is considered large if it reaches double digits.

Keep ReadingShow less
A post-it with "I Quit" written on it over a computer keypad
a yellow notepad on a keyboard
Photo by Nick Fewings on Unsplash

People Reveal Why They Quit Their Job On The First Day

As much as anyone may want to quit a job, at the end of the day it's easier said than done.

For one thing, even if people are working soul-sucking jobs that barely cover expenses, they still can't afford to lose the paycheck, until something better comes along.

Keep ReadingShow less