Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

We Now Know How Much Trump's Tariffs Will Cost the Average Taxpayer and, Yeah, It's a Lot

We Now Know How Much Trump's Tariffs Will Cost the Average Taxpayer and, Yeah, It's a Lot
WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 04: U.S. President Donald Trump (R) and Chinese Vice Premier Liu He talk to reporters in the Oval Office at the White House April 04, 2019 in Washington, DC. The New York Times reported Thursday that Trump is likely to announce plans for a future summit meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping to resolve remaining trade issues and sign a final agreement between the U.S. and China. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Not a win.

President Donald Trump's trade war with China, already costing American taxpayers $3 billion per month, may rack up an even bigger bill if Trump decides to levy tariffs on all $500+ billion worth of Chinese imports.

Politico reported on Tuesday that several independent studies estimate that additional tariffs would result in a tax increase for American consumers. And not we are not talking chump change here.


"The Peterson Institute for International Economics estimates the China tariffs amount to a tax hike of about $550 per American family. If Trump goes to 25 percent tariffs on over $500 billion in Chinese imports — hitting nearly every category of consumer goods from clothing and diapers to electronics — it could mean a $2,200 tax hike on the average family of three. By contrast, Trump’s tax cut gave middle-income families a tax cut of about $800, according to the Tax Policy Center."

An analysis by CNBC last week found that the "$72 billion in revenue from all the president’s tariffs" is "one of the biggest tax increases since 1993," CNBC said.  That figure amounts to the "largest increase as a percent of GDP since 1993 when compared with the first year of all the revenue measures enacted since then, according to the data."

Americans are already shouldering the entirety of the financial burden in Trump's trade spat with China, despite the president's intransigent insistence on the exact opposite.

“The costs of U.S. tariffs have fallen entirely on U.S. businesses and households, with no clear reduction in the prices charged by Chinese exporters,” analysts at Goldman Sachs wrote in a note last week. “Second, the effects of the tariffs have spilled over noticeably to the prices charged by U.S. producers competing with tariff-affected goods.”

Additionally, Deutsche Bank chief economist Michael Spencer has said that "the strong conclusion is that so far, U.S. consumers have borne substantially all of the tariff increase."

But trade wars are supposed to be "easy to win," right? That was Trump's assertion in March of 2018.

"When a country (USA) is losing many billions of dollars on trade with virtually every country it does business with, trade wars are good, and easy to win," he tweeted. "Example, when we are down $100 billion with a certain country and they get cute, don’t trade anymore-we win big. It’s easy!"

Is this what winning feels like?

There is a new hashtag floating around, and it is pretty much perfect.

Farmers have been especially hardest hit because of retaliatory tariffs imposed by China, and Trump is now demanding another round of bailouts - courtesy of John and Jane Q. Taxpayer - to the tune of $15-$20 billion. But these patchwork subsidies will only go so far.

Thus, the Chinese have begun to shmooze alternative markets - including Russia, which has offered to pick up our slack - for numerous products such as soybeans, pork, and dairy.

Other industrial giants, including Nike, Adidas, Under Armour, Foot Locker, warned Trump on Monday that imposing additional tariffs would be "catastrophic" for American consumers.

"Any action taken to increase duties on Chinese footwear will have an immediate and long-lasting effect on American individuals and families," members of the trade group Footwear Distributors and Retailers of America said in a letter to Trump, United States Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross and Larry Kudlow, the director of the National Economic Council. "It will also threaten the very economic viability of many companies in our industry."

They estimate that slapping another 25% tax on the remaining $325 billion worth of Chinese imports would amount to a $7 billion tax hike on consumers.

"We can assure you that any increase in the cost of importing shoes has a direct impact on the American footwear consumer," the companies wrote.

They added that they cannot simply ditch manufacturing in China and go somewhere else.

"Footwear is a very capital-intensive industry, with years of planning required to make sourcing decisions, and companies cannot simply move factories to adjust to these changes," they said.

Similarly, Walmart, the world's largest retailer, will be raising prices in order to offset its ballooning import tax burden.

"Increased tariffs will lead to increased prices, we believe, for our customers," Walmart chief financial officer Brett Biggs told reporters last Thursday.

More from People

Screenshots of Will Thilly breakdancing
New York Post/YouTube

Guy Breakdances His Way Into Town Hall Meeting To Ask Why Taxes Went Up—And Becomes An Instant Legend

Cranford, New Jersey town council candidate Will Thilly went viral after dancing his way up to the podium at a recent town hall meeting to ask why property taxes in Cranford have gone "up so much."

Thilly's unique tax protest began when he danced his way up to the podium and continued to dance even after a Cranford Township official said, "Mr. Thilly, I started your time." People laughed when Thilly held up a finger to stop the official and continued to dance anyway.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Brian Kilmeade
Fox News

Fox News Host Apologizes After His Suggestion That Homeless People Be Euthanized Sparks Outrage

Fox and Friends host Brian Kilmeade was criticized for suggesting that homeless people with mental health issues get "involuntary lethal injection" after the murder of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska on a train in North Carolina—and was swiftly condemned for an insincere apology several days after the fact as many are calling for Fox News to terminate his contract.

Zarutska was stabbed to death at the East/West Boulevard station on the Lynx Blue Line in Charlotte last month; her killer, a homeless man with a history of mental health issues, has since been charged with first-degree murder.

Keep ReadingShow less
Sofía Vergara
Bryan Steffy/Getty Images

Sofía Vergara Reveals She Missed Presenting At The Emmys Due To 'Craziest' Medical Emergency

Almost everyone has a favorite television show they like to turn on at the end of a rough day or binge-watch for a bit of nostalgia, and most of us pretty frequently check out new shows to see if we can spot a favorite.

Needless to say, the Emmys award show is a huge deal every year, honoring all of the people involved in the projects that are currently gracing the small screen, and basically anyone who's anyone will attend.

Keep ReadingShow less
Rep. Nancy Mace
CNN

Nancy Mace Just Tried To Claim She's Never 'Dehumanized' Her Colleagues—And The Internet Brought The Receipts

South Carolina Republican Representative Nancy Mace was called out for hypocrisy after she claimed on CNN that Democrats in Congress have been "dehumanizing" Republicans, a move she would "never" do—despite her record of doing just that.

Speaking to anchor Katie Bolduan while the search for the suspect who killed far-right activist Charlie Kirk was ongoing, Mace objected to Bolduan's observation that she was using "us v. them" language, only saying that things are "very one-sided right now." She also suggested that the situation is so bad for her that she's actually afraid of "just walking out in public."

Keep ReadingShow less
A younger man stand on top of a mountain with his arms outreached and his face looking to the sky. It's a beautiful day and lakes and mountains are the backdrop.
Photo by Kyle Loftus on Unsplash

People Who Quit Their High-Paying Jobs For Happiness Explain How It Turned Out

Sometimes money isn't the goal.

It is a BIG goal for many.

Keep ReadingShow less