Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

We Now Know How Much Trump's Tariffs Will Cost the Average Taxpayer and, Yeah, It's a Lot

We Now Know How Much Trump's Tariffs Will Cost the Average Taxpayer and, Yeah, It's a Lot
WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 04: U.S. President Donald Trump (R) and Chinese Vice Premier Liu He talk to reporters in the Oval Office at the White House April 04, 2019 in Washington, DC. The New York Times reported Thursday that Trump is likely to announce plans for a future summit meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping to resolve remaining trade issues and sign a final agreement between the U.S. and China. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Not a win.

President Donald Trump's trade war with China, already costing American taxpayers $3 billion per month, may rack up an even bigger bill if Trump decides to levy tariffs on all $500+ billion worth of Chinese imports.

Politico reported on Tuesday that several independent studies estimate that additional tariffs would result in a tax increase for American consumers. And not we are not talking chump change here.


"The Peterson Institute for International Economics estimates the China tariffs amount to a tax hike of about $550 per American family. If Trump goes to 25 percent tariffs on over $500 billion in Chinese imports — hitting nearly every category of consumer goods from clothing and diapers to electronics — it could mean a $2,200 tax hike on the average family of three. By contrast, Trump’s tax cut gave middle-income families a tax cut of about $800, according to the Tax Policy Center."

An analysis by CNBC last week found that the "$72 billion in revenue from all the president’s tariffs" is "one of the biggest tax increases since 1993," CNBC said.  That figure amounts to the "largest increase as a percent of GDP since 1993 when compared with the first year of all the revenue measures enacted since then, according to the data."

Americans are already shouldering the entirety of the financial burden in Trump's trade spat with China, despite the president's intransigent insistence on the exact opposite.

“The costs of U.S. tariffs have fallen entirely on U.S. businesses and households, with no clear reduction in the prices charged by Chinese exporters,” analysts at Goldman Sachs wrote in a note last week. “Second, the effects of the tariffs have spilled over noticeably to the prices charged by U.S. producers competing with tariff-affected goods.”

Additionally, Deutsche Bank chief economist Michael Spencer has said that "the strong conclusion is that so far, U.S. consumers have borne substantially all of the tariff increase."

But trade wars are supposed to be "easy to win," right? That was Trump's assertion in March of 2018.

"When a country (USA) is losing many billions of dollars on trade with virtually every country it does business with, trade wars are good, and easy to win," he tweeted. "Example, when we are down $100 billion with a certain country and they get cute, don’t trade anymore-we win big. It’s easy!"

Is this what winning feels like?

There is a new hashtag floating around, and it is pretty much perfect.

Farmers have been especially hardest hit because of retaliatory tariffs imposed by China, and Trump is now demanding another round of bailouts - courtesy of John and Jane Q. Taxpayer - to the tune of $15-$20 billion. But these patchwork subsidies will only go so far.

Thus, the Chinese have begun to shmooze alternative markets - including Russia, which has offered to pick up our slack - for numerous products such as soybeans, pork, and dairy.

Other industrial giants, including Nike, Adidas, Under Armour, Foot Locker, warned Trump on Monday that imposing additional tariffs would be "catastrophic" for American consumers.

"Any action taken to increase duties on Chinese footwear will have an immediate and long-lasting effect on American individuals and families," members of the trade group Footwear Distributors and Retailers of America said in a letter to Trump, United States Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross and Larry Kudlow, the director of the National Economic Council. "It will also threaten the very economic viability of many companies in our industry."

They estimate that slapping another 25% tax on the remaining $325 billion worth of Chinese imports would amount to a $7 billion tax hike on consumers.

"We can assure you that any increase in the cost of importing shoes has a direct impact on the American footwear consumer," the companies wrote.

They added that they cannot simply ditch manufacturing in China and go somewhere else.

"Footwear is a very capital-intensive industry, with years of planning required to make sourcing decisions, and companies cannot simply move factories to adjust to these changes," they said.

Similarly, Walmart, the world's largest retailer, will be raising prices in order to offset its ballooning import tax burden.

"Increased tariffs will lead to increased prices, we believe, for our customers," Walmart chief financial officer Brett Biggs told reporters last Thursday.

More from People

Nicholas Galitzine He-Man in 'Masters of the Universe'
Amazon MGM Studios

Conservatives Are Melting Down Over 'He-Man' Movie Joke About Pronouns—And They Missed The Point Entirely

Conservatives have basically two cherished hobbies: caterwauling about trans people and missing the point of every joke. And with the release of the trailer for the new He-Man movie, they got to do both in one go!

Nicholas Galitzine stars as the titular super hero in the upcoming film adaptation Masters of the Universe, and given our times, it's only natural the film would make a joke about pronouns.

Keep ReadingShow less
film clacker with popcorn
GR Stocks on Unsplash

Details People Saw In Movies That They Called BS On Because Of Their Job

Movies are designed to entertain us. As such, they often take creative license with reality.

After all, reality can be less than cinematic.

Keep ReadingShow less
Marjorie Taylor Greene§
Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

Even MTG Is Demanding That MAGA Admit The Killing Of Alex Pretti Was Completely Unjustified

Former Georgia Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene continues to speak out against the MAGA movement that brought her to national prominence, this time calling on Republicans to condemn the killing of Alex Pretti by ICE agents in Minneapolis.

Calls for an investigation have intensified from across the political spectrum after analysis of multiple videos showed ICE officers removing a handgun from Pretti—a weapon that authorities said Pretti was permitted to carry but was not handling at the time—before fatally shooting him.

Keep ReadingShow less
Chris Madel
@CWMadel/X

Minnesota Republican Condemns His Party In Powerful Video Announcing He's Dropping Out Of Gubernatorial Race

In a post across his social media, one of the Republican frontrunners for governor of Minnesota announced he would be ending his campaign due to the GOP's actions in his state.

In an almost 11-minute video, trial attorney Chris Madel condemned the administration of MAGA Republican President Donald Trump and the Republican National Committee in the wake of what he characterized as retaliatory actions by the Trump administration, Kristi Noem's Department of Homeland Security, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Minnesota that resulted in the recent murders of two United States citizens—Renée Good and Alex Pretti.

Keep ReadingShow less
Jason Segel attends The Critics' Choice Association's 4th Annual Celebration.
Rodin Eckenroth/Getty Images for Critics Choice Association

Jason Segel Admits He Didn't Tell His Parents About His 'Forgetting Sarah Marshall' Nude Scene As A 'Practical Joke'

In 2008, the world was graced with Jason Segel’s epic magnum opus, Forgetting Sarah Marshall, an R-rated comedy that went on to make over $105 million worldwide.

The film stars Segel alongside Mila Kunis, Kristen Bell, Paul Rudd, and Russell Brand. Written by Segel himself, the movie follows Peter, a heartbroken music composer who escapes to Hawaii to recover from a devastating breakup, only to discover that his ex-girlfriend, played by Bell, and her new boyfriend, portrayed by Brand, booked the exact same vacation.

Keep ReadingShow less