Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

We Now Know How Much Trump's Tariffs Will Cost the Average Taxpayer and, Yeah, It's a Lot

We Now Know How Much Trump's Tariffs Will Cost the Average Taxpayer and, Yeah, It's a Lot
WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 04: U.S. President Donald Trump (R) and Chinese Vice Premier Liu He talk to reporters in the Oval Office at the White House April 04, 2019 in Washington, DC. The New York Times reported Thursday that Trump is likely to announce plans for a future summit meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping to resolve remaining trade issues and sign a final agreement between the U.S. and China. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Not a win.

President Donald Trump's trade war with China, already costing American taxpayers $3 billion per month, may rack up an even bigger bill if Trump decides to levy tariffs on all $500+ billion worth of Chinese imports.

Politico reported on Tuesday that several independent studies estimate that additional tariffs would result in a tax increase for American consumers. And not we are not talking chump change here.


"The Peterson Institute for International Economics estimates the China tariffs amount to a tax hike of about $550 per American family. If Trump goes to 25 percent tariffs on over $500 billion in Chinese imports — hitting nearly every category of consumer goods from clothing and diapers to electronics — it could mean a $2,200 tax hike on the average family of three. By contrast, Trump’s tax cut gave middle-income families a tax cut of about $800, according to the Tax Policy Center."

An analysis by CNBC last week found that the "$72 billion in revenue from all the president’s tariffs" is "one of the biggest tax increases since 1993," CNBC said.  That figure amounts to the "largest increase as a percent of GDP since 1993 when compared with the first year of all the revenue measures enacted since then, according to the data."

Americans are already shouldering the entirety of the financial burden in Trump's trade spat with China, despite the president's intransigent insistence on the exact opposite.

“The costs of U.S. tariffs have fallen entirely on U.S. businesses and households, with no clear reduction in the prices charged by Chinese exporters,” analysts at Goldman Sachs wrote in a note last week. “Second, the effects of the tariffs have spilled over noticeably to the prices charged by U.S. producers competing with tariff-affected goods.”

Additionally, Deutsche Bank chief economist Michael Spencer has said that "the strong conclusion is that so far, U.S. consumers have borne substantially all of the tariff increase."

But trade wars are supposed to be "easy to win," right? That was Trump's assertion in March of 2018.

"When a country (USA) is losing many billions of dollars on trade with virtually every country it does business with, trade wars are good, and easy to win," he tweeted. "Example, when we are down $100 billion with a certain country and they get cute, don’t trade anymore-we win big. It’s easy!"

Is this what winning feels like?

There is a new hashtag floating around, and it is pretty much perfect.

Farmers have been especially hardest hit because of retaliatory tariffs imposed by China, and Trump is now demanding another round of bailouts - courtesy of John and Jane Q. Taxpayer - to the tune of $15-$20 billion. But these patchwork subsidies will only go so far.

Thus, the Chinese have begun to shmooze alternative markets - including Russia, which has offered to pick up our slack - for numerous products such as soybeans, pork, and dairy.

Other industrial giants, including Nike, Adidas, Under Armour, Foot Locker, warned Trump on Monday that imposing additional tariffs would be "catastrophic" for American consumers.

"Any action taken to increase duties on Chinese footwear will have an immediate and long-lasting effect on American individuals and families," members of the trade group Footwear Distributors and Retailers of America said in a letter to Trump, United States Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross and Larry Kudlow, the director of the National Economic Council. "It will also threaten the very economic viability of many companies in our industry."

They estimate that slapping another 25% tax on the remaining $325 billion worth of Chinese imports would amount to a $7 billion tax hike on consumers.

"We can assure you that any increase in the cost of importing shoes has a direct impact on the American footwear consumer," the companies wrote.

They added that they cannot simply ditch manufacturing in China and go somewhere else.

"Footwear is a very capital-intensive industry, with years of planning required to make sourcing decisions, and companies cannot simply move factories to adjust to these changes," they said.

Similarly, Walmart, the world's largest retailer, will be raising prices in order to offset its ballooning import tax burden.

"Increased tariffs will lead to increased prices, we believe, for our customers," Walmart chief financial officer Brett Biggs told reporters last Thursday.

More from People

Donald Trump; Pete Buttigieg
@Acyn/X; KC McGinnis/For The Washington Post via Getty Images

Clip Of Trump Mocking Pete Buttigieg As His Cronies Laugh Feels Like It's Straight Out Of 'Austin Powers'

A sycophant is a person who "acts obsequiously toward someone important in order to gain advantage." An acolyte is a "true believer who helps carry out orders like a henchman, sidekick, or disciple."

While the words often get used interchangeably, they don't mean the same thing.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Prince Harry; Donald Trump
The Late Show with Stephen Colbert/YouTube; Win McNamee/Getty Images

Prince Harry Just Took A Hilariously Brutal Jab At Trump During Surprise Appearance On 'Colbert'

Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, joined late-night host Stephen Colbert as a surprise for his opening monologue on Wednesday evening, and mocked President Donald Trump while he was at it.

Colbert was in the middle of ribbing the Hallmark channel and its string of royally-themed Christmas TV movies this year when he joked about how no one just "runs into a prince at their job." But then in walked Harry, who said he thought he was auditioning for a Christmas-themed Hallmark TV movie.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Donald Trump
@atrupar/X

Trump Dragged After Making Ridiculous Claim About Randomly Finding Billions On The 'Tariff Shelf'

President Donald Trump was criticized after he claimed to reporters this week that officials in his administration suddenly found $30 billion they "never knew existed"—located on what Trump referred to as the "tariff shelf."

Tariffs are a tax on imported goods, usually calculated as a percentage of the purchase price. While tariffs can shield domestic manufacturers by making foreign products more expensive, they are also used as a tool to penalize countries engaged in unfair trade practices, such as government subsidies or dumping goods below market value.

Keep ReadingShow less
food prep
Katie Smith on Unsplash

Professional Chefs Share The Top Mistakes Average Home Cooks Make

With the expansion of cable television and then streaming services, a number of competition shows featuring amateur home cooks. Shows like Master Chef and The Great British Bake Off garnered huge followings and spawned numerous global and domestic spin-offs.

The food produced by these amateurs is beyond the talents of even some professional chefs. But what about the average home cook? What can they learn from the professionals?

Keep ReadingShow less
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images

RFK Jr.'s HHS Blasted As CDC Panel Considers Dropping Life-Saving Hepatitis B Vaccine For Newborns

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's vaccine advisory panel, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), met Thursday for the first of two days of discussions about childhood vaccine schedules and recommendations.

The panel focused on the hepatitis B vaccine and plans to vote on Friday whether to continue recommending it be given to all children at birth or to recommend something entirely different. The panel previously tabled making a decision on infant and early childhood hep-B vaccination in September.

Keep ReadingShow less